May 11, 2013 TPATH- In light of this past week's Congressional hearings relating to the Benghazi coverup and the death of American citizens, allegations of political manipulation of information have become moot.  It is clear now that the factual abetment of information slithering out from the Obama administration was not the result of fear over being ousted from the Presidency, but fear of being remanded to the penitentiary.

For sure, as with most high crimes, the exordium was instigated by politics.  The fact that Obama had such a dismal record on every other front, domestic and foreign, it was imperative for him to be able to claim terrorism was defeated.  But this denial, before the fact, not after, is where the culpability for the deaths of those Americans originated.

The hearings made it strikingly clear.  This administration denied all requests for more security, prior to and leading up to the anniversary of 911, for one reason and one reason only.  More manpower would equate to less security and would indicate that claims of the demise of terrorism were false.  Regardless of the possible outcome, the lives of our heroes, it appears, were not even considered when weighted against the loss of a few votes.

Clearly, not providing more security could be a crime and the stand down order for the FEST team located in Tripoli, just an hour away, also is and possibly even a more blatant act of manslaughter.  Why? Because at that time, initiating a military response to Benghazi would do two things.  First and less important, it would prove that Obama did not have the terrorists defeated. But more importantly egregious, it would clearly indicate that not securing the Benghazi Mission, when requested, was a dangerous and flagrant disregard for human lives.

If the legal description, provided below, does not perfectly construe this Benghazi crime scene its hard to imagine what would.

MANSLAUGHTER, INVOLUNTARY
In order for a person to be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter the government must prove that someone was killed as a result of an act by the person;

Second, in the circumstances existing at the time, the person's act either was by its nature dangerous to human life or was done with reckless disregard for human life; and

Third, the person either knew that such conduct was a threat to the lives of others or knew of circumstances that would reasonably cause the person to foresee that such conduct might be a threat to the lives of others.



Now enter the crime of obstruction.  Once the administration understood that their actions were criminal in the flagrant disregard for human lives, and that disregard in fact did cause 4 deaths, the next crime of obstruction of justice began.

Blaming a ridiculous video, changing official information, hiding survivors, intimidating and demoting diplomats, refusing to disclose emails and communications between Libya and Washington, prior to, during and after the night long battle for survival, so very clearly falls into the realm of criminality.  The obstruction of justice law, described below couldn't be more relevant.

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Obstruction of justice is an attempt to interfere with the administration of the courts, the judicial system or law enforcement officers.

It may include tampering with or intimidating, hiding evidence or interfering with an arrest. It is something a person does to impede the administration of a court process or proper discharge of a legal duty.

Interference may be with the work of police, investigators, regulatory agencies, prosecutors, or other (usually government) officials. Often, no actual investigation or substantiated suspicion of a specific incident need exist to support a charge of obstruction of justice.

Such activity is a crime.

Knowing what we now know it is time to ensure the American people that Congress will get the answers to the following questions:

• Who authored the stand down order to Lt. Col. Gibson which prevented Fest from engaging the  terrorists who were attacking the Benghazi mission?
• Where was Obama during the more than 12 hours of the siege and evacuation?
• Who ordered Rice and Clinton to lie to the American people?

For certain there are a few more questions we would like to have answers to.  Not the least of which is, will Hillary Clinton forsake her overwhelming desire to be the first female President (and the 2nd Communist) and fall on her sword for the Divider N Chief?

Knowing the Clintons as we do, its not likely that Slick Willie will allow that to happen.  Especially since its also not likely that Billy has changed his percipience of Obama's  abilities regarding the conveyance of the morning coffee break. (sorry about that, I couldn't help myself)

So.... stay tuned.  Breaking the law is bad enough. Breaking the law and causing the death of Americans?  Very, very serious.

Congress, the ball is in your court.  You had better not let us down, again.

May 11, 2013 TPATH

Commentary by:
Dwight Kehoe



  May 3, 2013 TPATH - The dust has long since settled regarding this past Presidential election which has embittered, disappointed and jaundiced many of those recently awakened patriots who left the comfort of their homes, traveled to DC or state houses and protested the organized destruction of their country.  So many of them believed in their hearts, that millions of promulgating citizens, could wake up and shakeup, entrenched politicians.  The question is; Have they?

Let's review recent events:

• Obamacare was passed using questionable Senate procedures.
• Justice Roberts folded like like a Solyndra Solar panel and deserted his country.
• Four patriotic Americans were left alone in a 7 hour firefight while Obama rested up for a fund raiser.
• The Republican Congress has ignored the Constitution, under Article II relating to the "natural born citizen"  requirement to serve as America's President.
• The Us Attorney General provided Mexican drug lords with weapons which killed a border agent and many other innocent people.  Lots of talk, but no backbone and no substance from anyone to hold to account those responsible.
• The murderous cult called Islam has been allowed to infiltrate every aspect of our government and society as it continues to kill and maim Americans.
• America's ability to become energy independent is under constant assault from Obama's regulators
• Courts, judges, justices, prosecutors, state attorneys general as well as Congress and the media have ignored  a sitting President's creation and propagation of forged documents.
• The Republican Party, as well as law enforcement officials, during this past Presidential election cycle, submerged their collective heads in the sand and allowed the most egregious, blatant and in your face cheating, this or any other country, has ever seen.  Over 150 voting districts in this country reported not one single vote for MItt Romney.  Even Hugo Chavez and Saddam Hussein couldn't pull off numbers like that.
• Obama closes down important services to intentionally hurt the American people as a result of the Sequester that he proposed. And as the media sit there allowing Obama to blame the inept and AWOL Republicans, he is holding multimillion dollar parties and giving billions of dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood.
• The Republican Party is busy doing who knows what, while the Democrats, unconstitutionally, keep expanding "early voting" for Presidential Elections, which allows unfettered and behind closed door cheating. 
• Dragging  parents, awash in blood and misery over the loss of their children, into Obama's agenda of disarming all but criminals and the government has become standard operation in the war against the citizen's right to self defense.
  
• Regardless of the fact that the earth has been cooling for almost 2 decades and global warming studies have been proven to be intentionally falsified, the Carbon Tax push continues to be on the agenda of the left and commodiously ignored by the Republicans.
• Iran is being allowed to build atomic weapons.  Never in history has any country been forced to change major policy as a result of sanctions.  Obama knows this.  The media know this.  The Republicans know this.  Fortunately, Israel knows this.
  
• Obama has written or expanded over a thousand new Executive Orders which infringe on almost every aspect of our constitutional rights.  What is happening to stop this illegal "law making"?  Nothing!
• Government spending has been expanded into the realm of disbelief and  well beyond the ability of the average person to fathom. 
  
• The Federal Reserve continues creating dollars from thin air, from which hyper inflation, once begun, will be relentless and devastating to all but the very wealthy.   
  

Of course, in this dismal list of treachery and treason, which is proceeding mostly unabated, there may have been some small manifestation of victories resluting form the work of citizen patriots and a few elected politicians. 

The reality, unfortunately, is that the future and the prospects for stopping this expirtation of  the America our fathers and theirs have given us, are bleak.  For every skirmish won, too many large battle are being lost.

Please be aware, that this dissertaion, this dismal prognostication is not meant to suggest that our dedicated patriots will ever give in or give up.  Becasue those who have taken on this fight, will not.

So if roads are blocked, legal and lawful means are ignored, it maybe time to rethink the battle plans, the methods.   Not by use of stratagem, but by honest work, sacrifice and reorganization.  The only way to save what we cherish may just be the isolation of the cancerous lesions which threaten the whole.


  May 3, 2013 TPATH

Political Gadfly Series Part 2
              When Will The New Jersey GOP Get It?

April 29, 2013 TPATH
Written by:
Mr. Nicholas Purpura

In my last article I stated the GOPNJ is the only state Republican Party in the Union that has not adopted the Republican National Committee Platform. One must ask, why? Well one Republican Assemblymen, in a sullen whimper told me, “Nick you just don’t understand, New Jersey is mostly liberal, we have to compromise.“

Phantom Politics:

Republicans in Trenton are like ghosts or apparitions. Democrats suspect they are there, speak of them from time to time, but ignore any possibility of threat or involvement. If the gossamer battle lines, drawn in flimsy and intentionally ineffective defense of our conservative values, represent all that Republicans can do, because, New Jersey is mostly liberal, what purpose do they serve?

So why is New Jersey the least free state in the Union, the second highest taxed, and with one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation? Well for certain, the standard fare of New Jersey, crony politics, kickbacks, taxes, and over borrowing are major factors. But as Republicans have chosen stealth over steel they have essentially relegated New Jersey to one party control.

Any Republican who will not “stand up” and fight, should “stand down” and make room for those who will.

Governor Christie, with spectral affinity to the agenda of propaganda employed by his hug buddy Obama, keeps telling us New Jersey is coming back. Coming back to what? From what? Back to where we were before the sales tax, the increases in property taxes and the institution of the state income tax? All of which were agreed to by Christie's gadflies or those they have chosen to emulate.

Coming back? No Governor, not until we “go back”, back to when New Jersey had strong leaders who protected the hardworking taxpayer. And when the hardworking taxpayer was not prohibited from protecting himself.

Any chance that will ever happen again here in the Garden State? Not looking good from this vantage point. Now, it appears that Christie, not only is not looking at cutting taxes, but has indicated he is backing a new one, on the internet.

It seems its not good enough to have “brick and mortar” companies here floundering and struggling to make a profit, its time to do the same to the internet businesses. Great idea! Oh yea Governor, we are coming back.

Returning the attention back to the RNC Platform, the one the GOPNJ refuses to adopt. The reasons for that may be coming to view.

• Could it be because the National Platform of the GOP came out with a resolution calling for cooperation with conservative grassroots movements?

• Could it be because the RNC platform supports tax reform and lower taxes?

• Could it be that the RNC has called for stricter adherence to the Constitution?

Christie's comments about instituting yet more unconstitutional infringements on the honest citizen's 2^nd Amendment rights and even more taxes would be in stark contrast to the National Republican Platform.

In Part 1 of this series the NJGOP as well as our Governor were referenced as Democrat-Lite. However, in Governor Christie’s case maybe not all that lite. One would wonder when he will pull a Charlie Chris and switch parties. At this point, he is far ahead of where Charlie Chris was in Obama brownie points.

Just today, Christie continued with his one man admiration society pumping up his buddy Obama while talking to ultra liberal Joe Scarborough. Needless to say the good Governor knew he needed to plant the required, Obama and I are 95% in disagreement on political matters. Really? Let's review. Both Obama and Christie appoint leftists to the court system, both of them cater to and appoint Muslims, both love the idea of cap and trade, both are working to destroy gun rights, both are into new ways to tax and grow government, Obama refuses to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act and Christie appoints to the New Jersey Supreme Court, a leftist who totally agrees with that agenda.

So where is the 95% disagreement? Maybe they disagree on the size of food portions at the buffet table or maybe on who is better looking, Michelle or Reggie Love.

The nature of our political party system is that anyone can register in any party they so choose. The Marxist “Mommy State” politician, Large Soda Bloomberg, profoundly proves that point. But, calling oneself and astronaut, an engineer or a Republican, doesn't make it so.

Instead of working to find conservative candidates, those who may truly help turn New Jersey's economy around, the NJGOP Republican Convention last March committee people were told who the candidates would be. Those hand picked by the GOP were paraded on stage and no consideration was given to any but their picks. This happened in Monmouth County, but its a very good bet, Monmouth is no anomaly

The Governor is not the only problem here. Congressmen, Assemblymen, state senators are all the ingredients which continue to fowl the recipe for a prosperous NJ. When is the last time you have heard from your Congressman? Except of course during the campaign season when they need some cash. Heck, there is one congressman who doesn't even live in New Jersey and hasn't for many years. And though it may be difficult to blame him for wanting to live anyplace but the liberal Garden State, he does manage to get back here for a few weeks just prior to the November elections. How can this man represent NJ when he hasn't spent more than a few months here in the last 12 years?

And.....

When was the last time you heard (Assemblymen, Senators, and Freeholders) any of them demanding Governor Christie remove the automatic 2-percent cap for education funding– that after 5 years your property taxes will increase over 11-percent for education alone or a freeze on municipal taxes. What about the second Amendment? This is just the tip of the ice-berg

All we hear is please come to my fund raiser--That’s the problem, the NJGOP doesn’t get it, the establishment decides who will represent us, no debates, no choice, no voting on candidates. Just do as you’re told. And certainly, don’t expect us to allow any challenger to present their views to Republican Clubs.

People, it is time for a change. We need strong conservative candidates not only in the Republican party but in both parties. If conservatives are blocked out of the two parties, we need to look elsewhere, such as Independents.

Every candidate and incumbent should read the legislation proposed by individual citizens listed on the non-partisan TeamNJ-USA.com website. You will find much there that would protect your freedom and financial future.

It is suggested that you ask your incumbent elected official or challenger whether he/she finds any problem with these proposals. If they do, you should have a problem with them.

The Eagle

Edited by TPATH

April 27, 2013 TPATH- After having spent many decades working, building businesses and careers, raising  families, as so many other Americans have done, it has dawned on many of us, that maybe, just maybe, the typical political candidate, really doesn't become an an expert immediately after being elected.  They may become more arrogant, but remain quite stupid.

As our awareness of just how incompetent and ignorant most of these "elected experts" are and have been, it certainly is no surprise that this country is in such peril.  In fact, after hearing elected buffoons make statements like the ones below, it is a wonder why we are already not finished as a nation.  Some of us believe we are.

• We were told by one congressman that we had better not put too many people on a particular island for fear it would tip over and sink.
• Another wondered if the Mars Rover could be directed to the location where our astronauts planted the American Flag.
• Yet another informed the world that sharks still patrol the Atlantic Ocean looking to make an easy meal of slaves thrown overboard.
• A congresswoman, seeking to destroy the 2nd Amendment, informed us bans on large capacity magazines would save lives because "once they are empty, they will be useless".  Sort of like her grey matter.
• And of course there's the brilliant boob, VP Biden instructing women to empty their shotguns in the air if they come under threat of attack. Not only is that illegal, but the weapon will be empty of ammunition if the attack comes quickly. 

These are just a few instances.  There are many, many more.  In fact just, the idiocy of Biden could fill pages.

Now we have Senator McConnell assuming the position of "expert" as he informs a constituent on the finer points of Article II of our Constitution. Which by they way, he clearly has never even read.

A bit of background on what it was that caused "Professor McConnell" to expose his not so veiled incompetence.

Many of you may not be aware of the latest facts which have been uncovered that add to the mountains of other information, regarding Obama and his non-eligibility to serve as America's President.  If you get your news from Fox or Mark Levin or any of the other so called conservative outlets, as must McConnell, this will be news to you.

When an American citizen who travels outside of the country on a passport, and if that person is the guardian or parent of an infant child who is traveling with her/him, the guardian's passport must be updated to include a picture and information on the child. 

A person can not leave the country on an international flight, with an infant, without that paperwork being complete. 

So what does that have to do with Obama?  For those who have followed the colossal piles of miss-representations, forged and manipulated documents as well as the many deleted and hidden records concerning this one man, it has been the contention of those covering up for Obama, that his mother gave birth to him in Hawaii, then traveled, shortly thereafter to Kenya, taking along the newborn Obama.

It looks like the armies of forgers and document destroyers missed a very important document.  They have been good at removing the maternity hospital's visitor logbook from public view, since that would have shown that no one, not even Obama's mother's parents visited her during or after the birth. Which of course would be a very strong indication that she wasn't there herself, nor was baby Obama.

And despite what the expert Senator McConnell said, Obama's people have successfully hidden the original birth certificate, no one of authority has seen it. Ever.  That document was most likely the easiest thing to obscure, because it probably doesn't exist.

Relating further to travel and passports. Obama's passport is under deep cover.  Who knows what it would reveal about who Obama is, where he traveled and under what designation?  Some speculate his passport identifies him as a "foreign student".  One might wonder why the news media wouldn't be interested in that.  Maybe because, no matter what Obama is, he isn't a Republican. 

And too, during the decades of international flights, the government has kept records and stored them on microfiche.  These records listed all individuals and children who were flying in and out of the country.  If Obama was born in Hawaii and taken to Kenya, he and his mother would be listed.  Of course if she was listed, without the future community agitator, it might indicate he was still in the oven.

Here's a little quiz.  Of the 30 years of government records, can you speculate which set of records is missing from the microfiche files?  If you really need help with this, here's the answer.  The two week period during which Momma Obama traveled out of the country.  What a coincidence, huh? 

The diversions, document fraud, obfuscations and manipulations, connected to this one person, would make the ever transparent Federal Reserve blush with embarrassment.

So what is this latest passport issue?  It seems the "document destruction team"has overlooked something.  Momma Obama's passport has been found. With dated, stamped and verified travel to Kenya. Every piece of data is there, except for one minor little point.  No baby Obama.  No picture, as required.  No information on a tiny "citizen" traveling with mother to another country. 

In short, if Obama had already been born, his mother could not have taken him out of the country without updating her passport.  It simply would not have been allowed.

This information troubled Louis Hodges, a constituent of McConnell, so a letter was written and delivered to the good Senator.  Please click here to read that letter.

"When you contacted my office, you mentioned your concerns regarding President Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States. During the 2008 election season, President Obama released a copy of his birth certificate stating he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. Since the election, several public officials — including Republican Governor Linda Lingle – have viewed and certified the original document. The consensus is clear that President Obama is a natural-born citizen."

News flash to McConnell. Even if Obama was born on the steps of the Washington Monument, he will never be a natural born citizen because his father was never a US citizen.  Every minute he spends in our White House is an affront to the American people and our Constitution. 

Make no mistake about it.  The damage he has done and will do to this country, and those whom have covered for him, will be remembered in history. 

April 27, 2013 TPATH

April 8, 2013 TPATH

April 7, 2013 TPATH
This week's syndicated column by:
Diana West

Get ready for the last straw.

First, though, I’d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a “forbidden” column.

Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn’t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets – and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns fail to appear when covering news of the White House press conference where the president’s long-form birth certificate was unveiled, news of courtroom proceedings in various states on Obama’s ballot eligibility and news of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigators presenting evidence that the online Obama birth certificate is a forgery (and much more).

So be it. This was, as noted, the last straw.

I refer to something radio host Sean Hannity said on his show this week. He was speaking in rebuttal to a Democrat arguing that racism was a problem among conservatives. As evidence, the Democrat brought up the “birther issue” – the label used to encapsulate any topic related to Obama’s identity documents and constitutional eligibility. Erroneously, it is a label that narrowly connotes, and derisively so, only the belief that President Obama wasn’t born in the United States.

In fact, the whereabouts of Obama’s nativity is in no way the main bone of “birther” contention, despite the blinkered focus on it by the enforcers of silence. Of far greater concern to me, for starters, is the purportedly original documentation President Obama belatedly provided the American people to attest to his identity.


April 7, 2013  TPATH

March 25, 2013 -TPATH -  Recently Glenn Beck made a statement that appears to have gone unnoticed by most. The context of what he was saying was cast to the mundane when he admitted, after years on TV and the radio of saying the opposite, that he was prevented from taking up subjects by the stations where he worked.  This not only included FOX, but FOX was the object of the comment.

What does this tell us about the so called hard nosed,  conservative commentators we welcome into our homes each day in search of an alternative to the progressive media?  Well, for the most part it tells us that each of them are hypocrites at best and lying traitors at worst.

Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin and even the exalted one, Rush Limbaugh are under orders and constraints to avoid topics, and each of them, day after day, lie about it.  The half truths and intentionally misleading information coming from those we have depended upon are actually worse when this deception comes from, supposedly, our side.

This probably explains why the eligibility issue and Obama's many forged documents have been consistently ignored and those that bring up the subject are belittled and ridiculed.  It may not explain however why Beck has been the most abusive to his listeners, coming in just ahead of Mark Levin in nastiness, now that he has his own network.  Oh but it does.  Mr. Beck is and has been working, from day one, to get his internet show on as many cable and TV outlets as possible.

If he knows that discussing Obama's crimes and ineligibility will prevent his show from being picked up, he will do what he needs to do, he just told us that.

Even though Mr. Beck claims that he has, in his words, "debunked" the birthers, he has done nothing of the sort.  In fact he admits that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery.  He says that Obama did this just to tweak the birthers.  This is debunking?  A couple of questions for Glenn.  Why?  Why would the Chief Executive of the most powerful country in the world forge anything?  Why would he not, many years ago, tell Hawaii to release the original birth certificate?  Maybe there isn't one?

Glenn thinks this is just some kind of game the usurper is playing?  Well, Obama has either authorized or ordered a forgery of an official document and then waved waved it in front of the world claiming its legitimacy.  To Mr. Beck, this is nothing more than a joke?  No, no its not.  Its called a felony.  Mr. Beck's charade against corruption, fraud and  unconstitutional happenings in this country, and in his words, by both parties, is just that, a charade.

Its not necessary to go into detail on all of the crimes Obama and his people have committed.  Every one of which is being hidden from the American people by all those who should be and are supposed to be the watchdogs of our laws and the future of our country.  The news media, and that is all of the news media, Congressmen, Senators, judges and prosecutors are all on the wrong side of history.  None of them will be able to say, " I didn't know".  Those who know are hiding it and those that don't know, don't want to.

That is the very sad state we find ourselves in.    If all parts of a law are not enforced, no part can be.  This of course is the goal of the left and  Obama with his world order views.  But what is even worse, our side, those that rabble-rouse about the Constitution and then dismiss the attacks upon it for personal gain, are the most traitorous and egregious of the bunch.

If it wasn't before, it should be very clear now, that neither party nor any faux conservative talk show host, except Micheal Savage and Arron Klein,  want to stop Obama's leftist agenda.   They are all one and the same.  The lefties, while they may hide the extent of their agenda, are actually more honest than those claiming to want to stop it.

Here's why.  The one way to stop Obama's progression towards a "socialist utopia" is right in front of them.  Its called the Constitution.  The one way to stop Obamacare, the decimation of our military and the destruction of the American economy is being ignored by all of them.
 
If you hired  carpenters to build an addition on your house and they proceeded to hammer nails with the handle of a screwdriver, instead of a claw hammer, your first thought should be aimed at getting them out of your house. 

Its way past time, we Americans do the same for our houses.

March 25, 2013 TPATH 




 

 by: J. D. Heyes

March 13, 2013 TPATH (NaturalNews) When you hear some pundit or historian compare the loss of democratic republican rule currently taking place in the United States with how it happened in ancient Rome, you may be tempted to shrug it off as hyperbole or over dramatization.


When you hear a U.S. Supreme Court Justice and other top government officials use the comparison, it should alarm you tremendously because they are, in essence, firing a warning shot.


In a recent Q & A with students of the University of New Hampshire, former Justice David Souter made the comparison above, along with several other observations that he says all add up to a potential loss of democratic government - and freedom - for Americans at some point in the future.


When a former Supreme Court Justice is worried about our loss of democracy...


Souter made his comments during a lengthy response to a student's question: "My question tonight is really around where we started this conversation, which was really around the schools... And, I've heard a lot this evening about democratic principles, civic engagement, and I guess I'm wondering...if you could share with us your thoughts about what the appropriate role and, probably, responsibility as well of our schools to produce civically engaged students?"

Read more at  Natural News

March 13, 2013 TPATH

March 5, 2013 TPATH- If anyone here in New Jersey still has any doubt that the Republican politicians in this state are any less progressive and ignorant than the Democrats they claim to oppose, this latest "gun buy back" program announced yesterday by our Republican Attorney General, should put an end to it.

This latest idiocy is an extension of an earlier program in Camden and North Jersey where your politicians, the very people responsible for New Jersey's billions of dollars of debt, handed over an estimated $1 million  to gang bangers, criminals, burglars and thieves.

As has been the case not just here in New Jersey, but gun buy back  programs across the country such as Chicago, where most of the weapons which were turned in have been old, rusty, damaged and inoperable, were not a danger to anyone.

It might be asking too much of our politicians to check statistics on to what extent gun buying programs actually reduced violence before copying wasteful programs or continuing to hand over millions of tax payer dollars  to criminals and enterprising hoarders of useless junk.  There are no real hard facts or legitimate  ways to discern the validity  of such programs, except to compare crime stats before and after the programs were instituted.  No buy back program anywhere in this country has seen a drop in crime.  In many areas crime actually increased.

Many cities across the country are reconsidering their gun buying programs, finally, after millions of dollars wasted on this purely "feel good" but truly dangerous program.   New Jersey however, has no intention of learning from other's mistakes.  No sir, we need to follow the same idiotic paths as the fools who came before us.

Dangerous?  Why is it dangerous?  To answer that question you need to look at what weapons are turned in and of course, who is turning them in.  Thanks to the "no questions asked policy" anyone who has a stolen firearm or owns a firearm illegally, can prance in and get up to $250 of your taxed dollars.   What will these "gentlemen" do with your money?  Will they then drop out of the crime business, resign from their gangs,  buy a suit and get a job on Wall Street?  Not likely.

What is more probable, he will take that money and buy more ammunition for the good gun he kept.  You know, the one that can actually fire  rounds as opposed to the rusted piece of crap you just paid him $100 for.  Or he may combine the money you just gave him with money from his last crime and buy a really good weapon from Willie down on Springfield Ave.

As we stand by and watch our politicians pay good money for bad merchandise, we need to look into just who is turning in weapons and why?  A few really nasty stats here.

1. Most of the weapons turned in are inoperable.
2. Every single criminal that has turned in a broken, rusted or cheap weapon, either has another one or will purchase another one.
3. Many weapons turned in are old, were left to widows, have been stashed away in trunks or crawl spaces and would never have seen the light of day except someone decided to give them your money to throw their's away.
4. Thefts of firearms always rise just prior to and during the "no questions asked" buy back programs.
 

A final note for all of you emotionally controlled legislators and politicians.  You may well think you are doing the right thing and saving lives with this ridiculous program.   The hard facts are you are not saving lives, just wasting money.   Criminals will always be armed, $100 will never encourage them not to be.  And while you lay your progressive little heads down on your pillows each night, feeling comfortable that you did something to make New Jersey safer, the reality is, handing money to gang members may have had the opposite affect.  Sleep on that.

How comfortable would you be if this program was named to reflect what it actually did?  
  Such as: "The Criminal's Weapon Improvement Program".  

TPATH has a suggestion for a new law that would not cost tax payers money and would make our streets safer.
It's called "The Put Felons in Jail and Leave Honest Citizens Alone Act"   

March 5, 2013 TPATH

****

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2013
By Alan Caruba




February 27, 2013  TPATH - If you take a look at the map of the Middle East and read the daily headlines, you have to wonder what it must be like to be an Israeli—a nation the size of New Jersey—surrounded by Arabs driven insane by Islam, by a succession of brutal dictators, and by the never-ending hate-filled fulminations in the mosques and media against Zionism, Israel, and Jews.


The UN nuclear watchdog released a report last week stating that Iran has installed advanced technology at Natanz, its main site for uranium enhancement. Iran that has relentlessly sought to make its own nuclear weapons and the missiles with which to deliver them. In 2009, Dore Gold, Israel’s former ambassador to the United Nations—a hotbed of anti-Zionism—and the president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, authored “The Rise of Nuclear Iran: How Iran Defies the West.”

By RoseAnn Salanitri
Posted from Conservative News and Views
February 18, 2013

                 RoseAnn Salanitri
New Jersey Tea Party Caucus President


February 18, 2013 - TPATH  While there are many states with many political factions throughout these United States, New Jersey has always had a diverse population, and therefore a diverse legislature. In days past all legislators, irrespective of party affiliation, honored their oaths of office and considered themselves to be servants of the people. The times – they are a changing.

The New Jersey Firearms Hearings Were a Farce

New Jersey’s demographics reflect the changes we are seeing throughout America, but with that change the stench of elitism has arrogantly filled the hallowed halls of the State’s capital. At no time was the stench more odoriferous than at the State’s firearm hearings on February 13th.

The objections of the multitudes that flooded the halls were barely tolerated – to the point of several bills being voted on before public comments were heard. The commonality once shared by all legislators to support the Constitutions of the USA and of New Jersey had little bearing on the ideologues eager to recreate New Jersey according to their own worldview. The fact that they were elected to protect our government and took an oath to support our Constitutions meant nothing to them. The Constitutions they swore to support have become an inconvenience, which they circumvent and disregard at whim. This has resulted in an effective coup d’état that has gone unnoticed.  In New Jersey, as in other liberal-leaning states, the very people who are supposed to be protecting, preserving and supporting our state and national Constitutions are the very same people that are blatantly dismantling them piece by piece.  In short, it is the foxes that are now guarding the hen house.

Eric Holder said that no crisis should go to waste. It is shameful that our legislators are now exploiting the Newtown tragedies to promote their own agendas. They have used the recent barrage of violence against the innocent to further their goals to disarm America. This time the innocent victims won’t be those in classrooms, they will be all the citizens and residents of these United States. The only opposition to these treasonous ideologues has been a well-informed contingent of citizens who understand that our right to bear arms was not only created to protect us from criminals and terrorists but also to protect us from tyranny.

What checks and balances?

The problem is compounded by the now defunct check and balance system we all relied on to protect our constitutional rights.  Nationwide our rights are disintegrating before our very eyes.  And neither logic nor threats of impeachment faze these “servants of the people” who disrespect our rules of law but demand respect from our citizens in turn.  It is reasonable to assume that although they may be ideologues, they surely must be able to read and understand our Second Amendment that states: “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” is not a request; it is a demand.  It is an inalienable right protected in our Constitution. The right that should be in question is the right of our legislators to subvert our Constitution. This is the right that does not exist but has tyrannically been created by treasonous ideologues bent on dismantling America and all our liberties under the pretense of taking care of us.  Most dictatorships made the same promises to gain power.  All dictatorships broke those promises once they amassed their power base – as it was always their intention to do.

When will this stop?

When will this insanity stop?  I believe only when We the People rise up and speak with one voice that we will not tolerate these treasonous acts that subvert our laws, overthrow our system of government, and strip us of our God-given rights. Storming the Bastille may not be possible in America but we do have statehouses.  There is a time when civil disobedience becomes civic responsibility.  As New Jersey strives to compete with New York and other liberal states in its illegal disregard for our Constitutions, liberty’s best hope is in We the People who understand their civic responsibility.

RoseAnn Salanitri
February 18, 2013  TPATH

Editor's Addendum:
By TPATH

Every single individual who is either in Congress, the United States Senate or a state's legislature, should be required to answer these questions and then, every law they write or sponsor and how they vote on those laws, should all be based upon their honest answers.
  
1.   Do you deny that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights - (Amendments 1-10), are legal and binding law for America?

2.   Did you refuse to swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution when you took office?

3.   Do you believe individuals or groups should be able to pick and choose what laws they will abide by?

4.   Do you believe that selected portions of a legal document can be ignored without degrading the integrity of the entire contract? 

5.   Do you believe any part of the Constitution can be altered or voided without implementing those alterations via the provisions defined therein?

6.   Do you believe that any part of a contract or law can be lawfully changed without going through the legal process?

7.   Do you believe that the wealthy and the political elite are entitled to a higher level of equality than the rest of society?

8.   Do you believe it is possible to pass a law that will prevent criminals from obtaining and using firearms?

9.   Would you prefer a society where only the criminals were armed?

10. Do you believe that governmental tyranny is an anomaly of the past and can never happen again?

11. Do you believe a government is more likely to be less oppressive when its citizens are  unarmed?

12. If your loved ones were trapped in a location where everyone was being murdered, would you be comfortable knowing you passed a law which will prevent a good Samaritan from stopping the carnage?

13. Do you believe it is possible to remove every firearm from the country so that no one, criminal or honest citizen, will ever be able to use one?
 
If Your public servants answer NO to these questions and then find themselves voting YES to "infringe" on the 2nd Amendment, or any other law that runs contrary to the Constitution, they will have proven they are voting ideologically  and not Constitutionally and will in fact be in violation of the law and should be impeached or removed from office.

However, if even one of these questions received a YES answer, proof of their ignorance, naivety and blind arrogance should be sufficient to enlighten everyone to their incompetence.  

February 18, 2013 TPATH

****

State House Hearings Regarding

the Continued Destruction of Liberty
Trenton, NJ,  February 13, 2013

By Mr. Paul Draper

TPATH Executive Representative

Edited by

Dwight Kehoe

Trenton, NJ- State House -(TPATH)  For such short notice the turnout was surprisingly large. For a good idea of the total number please check out the Asbury Park Press estimate, and then multiply that number by 3.

While there was a fairly large crowd it seemed that there may not have been any valid reason for them to put the group in two different rooms. Unless of course one might consider the “Divide and Concur” concept might be in play.

Even though tax payers have payed for excessive amounts of "state of the art", audio-video equipment, those who actually paid for it, that's us, were only given an audio feed from the proceedings. Either they thought that crowd control might be difficult if we could see the scoundrels in the process of destroying the Constitution or they were scared to show us what they looked like.

The session began with Chairman Charles Mainor's opening remarks. For some reason, he thought it best to begin by letting everyone listening know he had no interest in taking our firearms. This was about as convincing as an Obama forged birth certificate. For sure, not a soul in the Chamber believed him, including the leftists of his party.

Then, in complete contrast to his opening statement, every move he made during the balance of the hearing, endeavored to do just what he claimed he didn't want to do. We were all so very surprised. Not!

Many, if not all introductory speakers, those who either wrote or co-sponsored the various illegal legislation, were given extra time. But when it was the people's time to speak, the timekeeper was extremely strict, interrupting the speaker at a time clearly designed to prevent a complete thought from being introduced. One could not be blamed for thinking we had been transported back in time to a Kandy Crawley Presidential debate.

Most of us who have, over the years, watched the liberties and freedoms afforded us by the Constitution, being crushed by not only the Democrats, but by those in our own party, were very pleasantly surprised by Sean Kean, who actually sounded like a Conservative. This lapse into sanity on his part may be a good sign that our people are beginning to see the light. Well, we can hope can't we?

Typical of politicians, not just here in New Jersey, it was quite clear that the gang of sycophants who were presenting the proposals neither read nor had a clue as to what the propositions were or represented.. The reason for the “audio only” setup became clear. They didn't want their faces connected to their ignorance.

Those good Americans who were speaking on behalf of the 2^nd Amendment were entirely more informed and educated than were any of the politicians who work for them.

They were all inspiring, but none more so than New Jersey's tireless defender of American values, Mr. Nicholas Purpura*, the Eagle. Mr. Purpura “electrified” the crowd with his passion, his knowledge and his undying energy and love for his country. Everyone in America should get a chance to hear what Nick said and the emotion in which he said it, but alas, no media outlet will report his words or replay his message.

Typical of Nick, he held back nothing in his fearless charge. TPATH will watch to see if his remarks get posted anywhere such as Facebook, etc. and will let our readers knew. If it does get posted, be sure to listen to the most uplifting dissertation you will have heard in a long, long time.

Field report provided by

TPATH Representative,

Mr. Paul Draper

Editor's Note:

Mr. Nicholas Purpura is TPATH contributor.

Encouragement In A Time Of Grave Fear 

By Charlie Daniels,
January 30, 2013 
Posted from World Net Daily

MR. CHARLIE DANIELS

If you read this column very often you know the frustration and disgust I feel for our government, their profligate spending, their all consuming passion for self-preservation, and the inevitable fall at the end of the ruinous path they seem so determined to force this nation down.

You know I'm deeply concerned about the rapid erosion of personal liberty and our president's cavalier attitude toward the Constitution and consolidation of power into a monolithic central, federal government, a bureaucratic nightmare that makes and enforces the rules, controlling even the administration of health care and the curriculum our children will study in school.

I fear the rampant apathy and lackadaisical work ethic of the entitlement society will become so deeply ingrained in the coming generations that the nanny state policies of this president and others like him who are likely to be elected will gradually drain the wealth and the will of the population until the well is bone dry and the confusion and anger of those who are suddenly left to fend for themselves will overrun the streets of this nation resulting in chaos and bloodshed.

I fear that this nation and this planet are in the midst of a great apostasy, or falling away from belief and faith in God as cults, false prophets and faddish feel-good religions pop up and capture the attention of many.

Even some of the old-line Christian denominations have tried to modernize their doctrine, bending the curve to accept things that are forbidden in the Bible, conveniently ignoring or subverting scriptures that fly in the face of the new age dogma they now embrace.

Anti-Semitism is on the rise around the world and while Islamic fanatics scream about the destruction of the State of Israel, the dominos in the Middle East fall one by one, with only the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan preventing the fulfillment of the ancient biblical prophecy that Jerusalem would be surrounded by armies.

Yes, I am very concerned about Israel. It is not the land of my birth, but when I became a Christian I was grafted into the root of Israel like a wild olive branch grafted on to a full-grown tree. The Bible says that salvation comes to the world through the Jews, the race of people by which the Creator of all mankind chose to reveal Himself to the world, the race into which my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ was born, the land where He would live and die on a cross for our sins.


Street gangs, flash mobs, drug cartels, incurable diseases, wholesale abortion the tearing down of traditional marriage and nuclear families, child molestation, the belittling of American exceptionalism, the export of manufacturing and jobs, murder, rape, home invasions, it's enough to give a person a nervous breakdown, but then I have to stop and think.


Any earthly leader or government, no matter how pervasive and powerful are only temporary place holders who will eventually pass into oblivion and be reduced to dust.

Israel will be battered and bloody but will never be completely destroyed and 85% of the vast armies allied against her in the final battle will be annihilated in the Jezreel Valley near Megiddo, known as Armageddon.

This earth with all its awesome military might, pompous politicians, mega-rich magnates and all the evil the powers of darkness can bring to bear are no more than a grain of sand compared to the indescribable power of the One who created the planets and flung them out across endless space, He who can part the sea and make the sun stand still.

Only One is Omnipresent, Omniscient and Omnipotent, He is everywhere, He knows everything and He can do anything. And yet in all His Majestic might, he cares for you to the point that He knows the number of hairs on your head.

His name is God, Jehovah, Yahweh, Dios to Spanish speakers, Gott to the Germans and so on, but He does have, always has had and always will have the last word and be the final judge in the affairs of mankind.


We will all stand before Him and give account for our lives, every king, every president, every dictator, every super star, every human being.

Lord, please help me to keep my confidence in You and my mind on eternal things to come. Amen.

What do you think?

Pray for our troops and the peace of Jerusalem.
God Bless America
Charlie Daniels

January 30, 2013 TPATH

By Roseann Salanitri
Posted from Conservative News and Views
January 24, 2013



It may be time to take a page out of the left’s play book. To the best of my recollection, the left began writing its new dictionary back in the early 1970s. They quickly learned that changing words could affect the argument by reshaping the public’s perspective. To name the most obvious, a baby became a fetus (which word, BTW, means an unborn calf – Ed.), sex education became a family/life curriculum and sexual perversion became a lifestyle choice. Regardless of their objectives, this strategy has proven to be effective. Therefore, I think those on the right side of issues might be wise to start calling a spade a shovel. My first suggestion would be to stop using archaic words when defending our Second Amendment rights.

What the Second Amendment really means.

The Second Amendment reads:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Due to the outdated words “militia” and “bear”, some of our leaders (such as Eric Holder) have sought to re-define the meaning of the Amendment by re-defining the words. I will also discuss the meaning of the word “infringe” at the end of this post.

In a 2008 United States Supreme Court Case (District of Columbia v. Heller), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment ensures an individual the right to bear arms. Regarding the word “bear”, according to SCOTUS, the word means to have and be entitled to and to have and use, among other things.

Mr. Holder disagrees. He stated that he doesn't believe that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to bear arms. So what does Mr. Holder believe about the Second Amendment?

Holder has argued that a “well regulated Militia” means our Armed forces or our National Guard. Does that make sense? Logically it would seem absurd that any country needs to protect its right to keep Armed Forces and at the time the Second Amendment was written there was no such thing as a National Guard. (Nor a standing army, either – Ed.) It is even more absurd when you realize that our first 10 Amendments to the Constitution were written in order to preserve and protect the rights of citizens against the government – besides which, running our nation’s military had been clearly defined within Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution.

What did “militia” mean at the time of our Revolution?

The battle flag of the defenders at Gonzales. This was their answer to Generalissimo Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana, who demanded a return of their cannon.
Since the meanings of words are subject to change and interpretation, it would make sense to refer to how the words in questions were used at the time of the Revolutionary War. Thomas Fessenden, who fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill (also known as Breed’s Hill), was deposed on April 23, 1775. At that time Fessenden stated:

I, Thomas Fessenden, of Lawful age, testify and Declare, that, being in a Pasture near the meeting house, at said Lexington, on Wednesday last, at about half an hour before sunrise, I saw a number of Regular troops pass speedily by said meeting house, on their way towards a Company of Militia of said Lexington, who were assembled to the number of about one hundred in a company, at the Distance of eighteen or twenty rods from said meeting house; and after they had passed by said meeting house, I saw three Officers, on horseback, advance to the front of said Regulars, when one of them, being within six rods of the said Militia, cryed out, “Disperse, you Rebels, immediately,” on which he Brandished his sword over his head three times; meanwhiles the second Officer, who was about two rods behind him, fired a Pistol, pointed at said Militia, and the Regulars kept huzzaing till he had finished brandishing his sword, and when he had thus finished brandishing his sword, he pointed it Down towards said Militia, and immediately on which the said Regulars fired a Volley at the Militia, and then I ran off as fast as I could, while they continued firing, till I got out of their reach. I further testify, that as soon as ever the officer Cryed “Disperse, you rebels,” the said Company of Militia dispersed every way, as fast as they could, and, while they were Dispersing, the regulars kept firing at them incessantly: And further saith not.

(Bold added as emphasis. This deposition is listed as #13, p.346 in the Concord, Middlesex Co., Massachusetts Historical Appendix Index http://files.usgwarchives.net/ma/middlesex/towns/concord/histchapp.txt

In his deposition Fessenden makes a clear distinction between “Regulars” and the “Militia.” During the 18th century, a Militia was a body of citizen soldiers as distinguished from professional soldiers. Our Founders appreciated the importance of citizens being able to defend their local turf and their necessity to bear arms in order to do just that.

The most liberal Circuit Court in the nation, the Ninth, in Nordyke v. King seemed to agree. They stated:
The right to bear arms is a bulwark against external invasion. We should not be overconfident that oceans on our east and west coasts alone can preserve security. We recently saw in the case of the terrorist attack on Mumbai that terrorist may enter a country covertly by ocean routes, landing in small craft and then assembling to wreak havoc. That we have a lawfully armed populace adds a measure of security for all of us and makes less likely that a band of terrorist could make headway in an attack on any community before more professional forces arrived.

What those Executive Orders do?

Among the 23 Gun Control Executive Orders recently signed by Mr. Obama, #4 is even more disconcerting when considering Mr. Holder’s interpretation of words. This Order states:

Direct the attorney general (Mr. Holder) to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure that dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.

This EO imbues Mr. Holder with the authority to categorize individuals that he believes are dangerous and should be denied their Second Amendment rights. Of course Mexican Drug Cartels are not subject to our Constitution, but the Fast and Furious debacle can serve as a further indication of Mr. Holder’s reasoning skills. In this topsy-turvy world where up is down and down is up, only God knows how Mr. Holder will interpret the word “dangerous.” To him “dangerous people” can mean anyone that challenges the Administration’s agenda in any way, shape or form.

What does “infringe” mean?

Lastly, the Second Amendment also states that our right to bear arms shall not be infringed. The word “infringed” is perhaps the most powerful word in the Amendment, as well as the word we discuss the least – an unfortunate combination. In a March 27, 2009 interview, Holder stated that we should re-institute the ban on assault weapons. But Mr. Holder isn’t the only public official infringing upon our Second Amendment right to bear arms. Governor Cuomo and Mayor Bloomberg, both from the State of New York, are ardent Second Amendment “Infringers.” My apologies for making up a word but none that I know off seem adequate in this instance.

Webster’s 1828 dictionary gives several meanings for the word infringe that apply. The ones that speak the loudest in this circumstance are: to break, to violate, to transgress, to neglect to fulfill or obey, to destroy or hinder, to injure, to hurt, to interrupt, to disturb, to oppose, obstruct or defeat the operation or effect of, to pass over or beyond any limit, to surpass, to demolish, to pull down, to ruin or annihilate, to lay waste or to make desolate, to cause to cease, to impede or restrain or obstruct.

The Second Amendment in modern English

The Second Amendment in modern day vernacular might read something like this:

An organized group of citizen soldiers who are not part of our Armed Forces are necessary to protecting the freedoms of their local communities and defending themselves and their families. Therefore, the right of all people to have and use firearms should not be violated, transgressed upon, destroyed or hindered, injured or hurt, interrupted, disturbed, opposed, obstructed, defeated, surpassed, demolished, pulled down, ruined or annihilated, laid waste, made desolate, caused to cease, impeded, restrained or obstructed in any way.


If all of the above isn’t enough, remember that our Founders based the principles of our government upon our inalienable God-given rights. Who can argue that one of these rights is our right to self-defense? When all is said and done and all arguments regarding the Second Amendment are laid to rest, our right to defend ourselves, our families and our communities is about as inalienable a God-given right as any right can be.


In conclusion, it just may be high time we start re-defining our Second Amendment right to bear arms as our right to self-defense. Infringing upon our right to self-defense might be a more difficult case to make than taking guns away from those deemed dangerous.

Roseann Salanitri
January 24, 2013 TPATH

****

By Mr. Nicholas Purpura
In collaboration with TPATH
January 16, 2013 

Dear Sheriff,
A sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in each county in every state. Every sheriff swears an oath to “…support and defend the United States Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic.”

At this time, here and now, the American people are facing a domestic enemy that continually violates the U.S. Constitution. Yet, the spineless Congress as well as the Judiciary have very clearly demonstrated that that oath of office is meaningless, at least to them. And, as for courage?  They have none.

Who will stand up for the People?

Only the county Sheriff has the legal jurisdictional authority to stand against a tyrannical administration. The time has come for every Sheriff to decide whether he is a person of honor, who will abide by his oath of office to defend the Constitution. The question is, will our Sheriff cower to tyranny out of fear paving the way to tyranny?

Mr. Obama is contemplating nineteen “Executive Orders” to curtail firearm ownership. Legally it is inarguable such an order will irrefutably usurp the United States Constitution, which is and has been ajudicated as Positive Law. 

A point of reference - Amendment II:
"…the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

First and foremost, the founding fathers defined militia as all men 16 to 60. The progressive Marxists would have you believe the militia is only the National Guard. That fabrication is repeatedly advanced by the leftists in order to disarm the public. At the time of the adoption of the 2nd Amendment, there was no such thing as state organized militias. In fact that entity did not come into existence until 1902.  Regardless, until and unless the people of this country ratify changes to the Second Amendment, Congress, the Executive Branch, or the Judiciary can not legally violate the right of the people to own and bear arms.

Let me make this absolutely clear, “Executive Orders” are not, nor ever will be law. Only the quislings in Congress have the authority to make law. And they too are bound by the parameters and script of the Constitution. Any law, produced in that institution must not, and legally can not, violate the people's rights as defined therein.

Robert Longley, at About.com, likewise confirmed how executive orders work.  While they do bypass the U.S. Congress and the standard legislative law making process, no part of an executive order may direct the agencies to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities.

The Sheriff of any county, of every state, has the authority and obligation to arrest any federal agent or state official attempting to enforce unconstitutional regulations or any “Executive Order” that would usurp the constitutional rights of their citizens.

Sadly, the people of New Jersey, New York and other liberal bastions of progressive-ism have governors and legislators that repeatedly demonstrate their contempt of the Second Amendment. But there is a bright side. The Sheriff, who answers only to the people who elected him, short of a new revolution, is the last defense against federal and state tyranny.  Will we be able to count on them to do what they swore an oath to do?

Equal protection under the law.

Let’s take a different approach, I truly believe an argument can be made, that any regulation, legislation, or Executive Order banning or restricting any type firearm violates the “Equal Protection Clause.” Bear with me.

The law is well defined. The police can act only after a crime is committed. That’s right, they are under no obligation to protect you unless a crime is in progress or has occurred. A federal court in Washington D.C. made that clear. "The police are responsible to respond within a reasonable time frame and have no culpability, if a victim of a crime was injured regardless of how long it took to respond, even in a life and death situation".

Of course the parasites in public office have armed security details for themselves and their families, 24-7. Yet the rest of the population does not. Any high office holder, as well as political donors, can obtain a concealed firearm permits, even in liberal states. But the average law abiding citizen, who by the way foots the bill for the armed protection of those politicians, is almost never allowed a carry permit.

Is this equal protection under the law? Or like in George Orwell's "Animal Farm" and as in every communist nation on earth, are some people more equal than others?

Lastly, I remind the reader and especially every Sheriff what the most liberal Circuit Court in the nation, the Ninth, held in Nordyke v. King:

"The right to bear arms is a bulwark against external invasion. We should not be overconfident that oceans on out east and west coasts alone can preserve security. We recently saw in the case of the terrorist attack on Mumbai that terrorist may enter a country covertly by ocean routes, landing in small craft and then assembling to wreak havoc. That we have a lawfully armed populace adds a measure of security for all of us and makes less likely that a band of terrorist could make headway in an attack on any community before more professional forces arrived.

Second, the right to bear is a protection against the possibility that even our own government could degenerate into tyranny, though this may seem unlikely, this possibility should be guarded against with individual diligence."

One would believe even this bastion of liberal jurisprudence must have had the this Obama Administration in mind when adding that last sentence.

In yet another ruling, this from the US Supreme Court, in the case of District of Columbia vs. Heller, regarding the banning handguns in Washington D.C., Justice Antonin Scalia held in the majority opinion:

"The Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding."

So the question is Sheriff, you know the law, you understand the Constitution and you have seen judicial precedent, what will you do?

Will you defend the Constitution of the United States? Will you honor your oath of office? The citizens of the People’s Republic of New Jersey, as well as the people throughout the United States await your reply. 


The Eagle
January 16, 2013 TPATH

***

2. The increase in capital gains taxes, which Buffet and many other asset rich liberals were demanding, will take 514 years to cover Obama's deficit of just his first year as Usurper and Chief.

3. The projected additional tax dollars going to the government will be about $660 Billion a year.  The word projected  because that number fails, as it always does, to take into account the slowdown of investment and growth new taxes always create.

4. Here's a little ice water splash in the face of those Obama sycophants who were told only the nasty rich, those already paying for every government benefit check they receive each month, would be the only one's paying more taxes.  Everyone's paycheck will be reduced by 2%.  Not just those earning $400K a year but, everyone, even those on minimum wage who work a mop in McDonald's.  Most people, who may not be taking part in marijuana give away program, have no doubt already noticed their paycheck has shrunk.

5. The deal does not include even one dollar of spending cuts for at least two years which, if we can rely on history, means never.

6. For every $1 this budget deal "supposes" it will take in, the Obama administration and your GOP, will spend $2.

7. Those middle and upper middle income earners, who have worked, saved and invested, and who have paid taxes on everything they own, everything they have earned, if they have been successful in acquiring a second home, a decent investment portfolio and other assets, good news.  This budget deal steals 40% of your children s' inheritance.  Keep in mind that only those without the top flight accountants will pay this tax. As always, multi-millionaires and billionaires will work the system, through annuities and trusts, to get under that $5 million threshold. 

8. Regardless of whether or not the increase in tax rates on income will affect only the "productive rich", everyone will pay more for services and products as corporations raise prices or go out of business.  Those who purchase, pay the tax increases.

This Fiscal Cliff thing was, just as every other political phraseology has been, just another made up crisis scenario used to perpetrate yet another occasion to further destroy our country.   Oh yea!, There is a crisis alright.  But the train is already headed to the bottom of the canyon.  This bi-partisan suicide pact did not slow it down.  It actually sped it up.

Will the GOP take the deficit spending tool out of Obama's hands?  The answer is, no.  They will not stop his intentional economic destruction and they  will go down in history as equal partners.

January 10, 2012 TPATH   

***

I WAS JUST THINKING...............

&- Why has common sense become so uncommon?

&- You may well be able to ignore the danger of socialist change, but the reality of that change will not ignore you.

& - If I have to pay more for my needs because taxes were raised on them, have my taxes been raised? 

& - By ignoring Obama's forgeries and felonies the news media feeds that monster that will ultimately consume them.

& - Should I feel sorry for Obama if he wins a second term?  Look at the unbelievable mess he left himself.

& - Why are so many people worrying about what Mitt Romney does with his money instead of what Obama is doing with theirs?

& - Wouldn't re-electing Obama be like backing up the Titanic and having another go at the iceberg?

& - Progressives hate Capitalism but love capital.  Yours!