Read them here or download and save



Commentary By
Editor TPATH
Dwight Kehoe

Note from TPATH: At first glance this article will seem too long and too time consuming to read.  Please settle back, grab a hot tea or an adult beverage and take some time to read it.  We have spent months of time and effort to prepare and present this for you.  We promise you won't be disappointed and you will have some powerful talking points for your liberal friends. 

January 14, 2014 ~TPATH~  Alright, its time to admit it.  I'm a cynic.  You will have to excuse me for not accepting, without proof, anything people or groups preach without seeing some facts.   Especially if a particular group has an agenda aimed at confiscation and distribution of property they don't own or have any right to.

Having a business background in engineering, architecture, mathematics and software design, I may tend to require a bit more, shall we call it, tangible proof, than the average Joe.  So when I'm told that my activity is causing the end of the earth and man's existence thereon, you might say that I'm not willing to be herded into some theoretical vortex, without hard and tangible facts.

Despite having to deal with so much the leftists and progressives are relentlessly assaulting us with, I have spent the last several months acquiring data, analyzing it and as we say in mathematics, running the numbers.  Nothing one could do or say so clearly unveils preposterous claims as taking those claims to a final product and then examining them.

The information we will present here is accurate and has been checked and rechecked.  All of our calculations will be made available to anyone who requests them, but it is highly doubtful anyone from Al Gore's circles will want to be anywhere near this article.  For certain many of the calculations we did, would pretty much bore the furry pants off a polar bear, but I will try to present them in an interesting way that should keep you fascinated while providing you with facts for that crazy liberal uncle.  (Don't deny it, we all have a crazy lib somewhere in the family.)

Before we get into numbers, percentages, sea levels and carbon dioxide properties, it seems prudent to share (share, what a nice word!) with you some interesting facts and some of the many misrepresentations we discovered the global warming hoaxsters have been using for many years.  Long before they discovered their new favorite word, vortex.

How many of us and our children have seen the pictures of the forlorn and desperate, cuddly polar bear stranded on an ice berg not much larger than a lily pad, starving to death and hopelessly floating out to sea?  The phony story line for that is, because you drive an SUV all the land ice has disappeared and the polar bear is clinging to the last known piece of solid footing.

The truth about that polar bear and all polar bears is that aside from whales and dolphins, they are the most proficient swimmers in the mammal world.  In fact they spend more time in the water than do seals, walruses or even penguins.  Polar bears have been known to swim over 600 miles.  Its more likely that the polar bear in that picture was on that ice flow because it was fun.  And, distinctly opposite from what the global warming scammers have reported, the polar bear population has never been larger than it is today.

The other pictures we are shown are those where the ice from the polar caps is dropping into the sea.  We are told that the rate of this loss is so alarming that in several years all this ice will have melted and raised the sea levels which will put homes in Kansas under water. All that needs to be done to keep this hoax going is for you to forget all the prior ominous predictions which have come and gone and just tremble over the new ones.

The Sierra Club which has made some of these videos and pictures available have refused to release information on where or when they where taken.  We found out why.  They were taken of glaciers which have not melted into the sea but have reached the sea.  All glaciers, whether it's cold or warm slide their way to sea level.  It's sort of what they do.  Its called gravity, not global warming.  Here's how it works.  Over the centuries, snow builds and compacts in the higher elevations of the polar regions.  The snow packs and as it gets deeper it becomes more dense and massively heavy.  They become formations called glaciers.

Because these glaciers are as much as two or three miles above sea level, after they become large enough and heavy enough, they start moving downward towards the sea.  The move is slow, relentless and unstoppable.  There are several massively huge glaciers and many smaller ones, which at all times, all seasons and all temperatures, are heading down the mountain.  And when they get to the sea what happens? They break off, fall in, and float away.  A polar bear may even find one for that rare photo op.  

The bottom line? Glaciers move downward toward the sea, regardless of how often you exhale C02.  Mass, weight and gravity move them. Nothing else.  

During our research we found that social scientists are teaching your kids that carbon dioxide is a toxin and is killing fish and wildlife and destroying the earth.   One experiment we found them using is so blatantly illogical it's hard to imagine even those ideologues would have the nerve to teach it.  But they do. 

Here it is.  They put 100% pure oxygen in one sealed container and put 40% carbon dioxide and 60% oxygen in another.  They heat both containers and monitor how long it takes each to cool down once the heat source is removed.  Carbon dioxide which is much denser than oxygen will cool more slowly.   Of course if they had of heated cream cheese in another container it would have cooled even slower.  This so called "teaching aide" fails to inform the children that carbon dioxide in the air is .004% and about 10,000 times less than in the experiment.   It also ignores their main premise and that is, that C02, a greenhouse gas, blocks heat from escaping the earth, not warming it as a heated campfire rock would do in your sleeping bag.

To complete the absurdity of this propaganda its important to know the reason C02 was selected as the producer of global warming.   It is actually the only gas or bi-product of living, breathing and industry that can't be controlled.  Just plain carbon or carbon and chemical bi-products would not serve the purpose. They can be controlled.  A clean and cooler environment is not the objective. Confiscating your money is. 

Drowning polar bears, sliding glaciers and moronic science class propaganda are the only criteria in which the fools of this world have allowed themselves to me used and misled by leftists, communists and thieves.   You may find yourself in a discussion with a caring and concerned citizen environmentalist who may offer one or more of these items as proof, man is heating up the world.  

After you explain to them the reality of gravity and polar bear aquatics, and just before they start calling you names and describing what they think of your ancestry, you might try giving them a few of the facts we listed below and see what type of response you get. This is said, more or less tongue in cheek, because we all know actual facts tend to provoke even more turpitude from the "true believers".

 As you review or print out the data we have researched and the calculations we have provided below, keep in mind that not one, as in none, of the doomsday prognostications have come anywhere near reality.  In fact in almost every case, results are so erroneous its almost comical.  A case in point, as the hoax of all hoaxes is unraveling right under their elitist noses, in a last ditch effort to keep their money grubbing hands in our pockets, the New Polar Vortex, the savior of stupidity,  seems to have appeared right out of Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.   

All you Trekkies out there will remember how the series used a combination of two or three technical words to form terms which in turn made the impossible seem plausible.  It was a cute little trick.  As in "Captain, the gravitational vortex is collapsing, I canut' hold er much longer!"  or "Scottie, can you increase the time warp vortex long enough for the nexus plasma to stabilize?'"  

Speaking of holding something together, the inventors of the fabricated "hockey Stick" theory have degenerated into continuing their failed charlatanism using terms Mr. Spock would be proud of.   If you haven't heard, according to these wizards of smarts, the world is suffering from extreme cold because man made global warming has created, heaven help us, the POLAR VORTEX.

Try to stay with us on this, the oceans have so heated up that they are sending huge amounts of globally warmed air and water currents up the north pole which forces all the below freezing arctic temperatures down the center of the continent.  And prest-o/change-o, you have warming causing freezing.  Its so simple. All you need is that Polar Vortex thing.   Oh yea, and another thing you would need, freezing arctic temperatures that these clowns said would be gone by 2014.   I guess if you are a leftist idiot, hell bent on continuing your scam, you can have it both ways.  

January 14, 2014 ~TPATH~  END PART I





Without a doubt the best research data available





Let's check the facts and run the numbers.

Commentary, facts and backup By:
Dwight Kehoe
Editor TPATH

February 2, 2014 ~TPATH~
As a result of this past week's compilation of deception and lies, better known as the State of the Union Address, where the fabrication of man made global warming was added to the list of other falsehoods, we felt it was time to re-post this earlier article.  We have added a few things and edited others for clarity.  So even if you read this on the original posting, you might like to review it.

 Carbon Dioxide is not a toxic or poisonous compound:

 If it were, anyone drinking soda, beer or champagne would be dead or sick.  Co2 is as vital to all life on this planet as is oxygen.  Without Co2, plants and vegetation would not exist nor would the animals which feed on it.  Algae and plankton (parts of which are plant life) would not exist, nor would the fish and marine mammals which feed on them.

In fact, in experiments, when Co2 levels in controlled environments were doubled and tripled the amounts found in the atmosphere, vegetables, fruits and all vegetation grew larger and healthier of those subjected to (normal) levels.

Co2 is heavier and denser than oxygen by almost 4 times.  For that reason carbon dioxide exists  at the highest percentage levels at or near sea level.  As a result, other gases such as ozone, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and water vapor reside higher in the atmosphere and are much more likely to trap thermal temperatures, better known as the greenhouse effect.

It is a fact that Co2 in very high levels, within a controlled enclosure would displace oxygen and could therefore cause suffocation.  That person will not have been poisoned, he will simply have expired do to the lack of oxygen.  Far different from ozone, methane and carbon monoxide, which are truly toxic compounds. 

Higher amounts of Co2, in any possible percentage, does not effect global temperature:
Actually it's the converse.  Global temperatures effect Co2 levels.  Analyzing core samples have proven that Co2 percentages, spanning centuries, increase following rises in global temperature, not prior to it.  This one fact alone, the one the hoaxsters work most diligently to obscure, puts an end to the man made global warming charade.

Co2 has not risen significantly over the last 100 years of the industrial age:
At the turn of the 19th century Co2 levels were .0038% of the atmosphere. The latest global reading shows levels are now .0045%. That means, even if mankind was causing any significant rise in Co2 levels, which there is no proof of, it has risen just .0007% in well over a century.

Referencing the core samples above, Co2 levels, 100's of years before humans could have had any effect on them, were as much as 2 and 3 times higher than the present, and global temperatures were many degrees lower.

Global temperature increases in relation to Co2 elevations:
If Co2 levels increased because of humans and if that rise created elevated global temperatures, which neither do, at the rate humans are supposedly rising Co2 levels and comparing the actual global temperature increase during the  .0007% rise in Co2, the danger to mankind's existence would certainly not be imminent. 

For example, during the 100 year period referred to in an above paragraph, global temperatures have increased by just under one degree. With none of that increase coming during the last 17 years.  To put this into terms relative to a typical human life span, if the average temperature when you were born, and you are now 50 years old, was 68 degrees, you would now be sweltering in an unbearable 68 1/2  degrees.  And if you lived to be 100, you would have to endure as much as 69 degrees.

Or to put it another way, if humans were the factor in Co2 increases, and at the rate we have been accused of increasing it, it would take 1,425 years to increase Co2 levels by just 1%.  (Note: There is no proof man is responsible for this latest rise.  We are using their numbers simply to show the absurdity.)

Man's contribution to Co2:
Still supposing the Co2 humans are putting into the atmosphere is actually contributing to global warming, we have prepared some very interesting calculations.  This is where running the numbers gets to be fun. Unless of course if facts, calculations and common sense get in the way of emotionally driven ideology. 

During any given point in a year there is an approximated 186 billion tons of Co2 on the earth.  These estimated totals include accumulated Co2 in the land, sea and air.    Incorporating the data the hoaxsters love to quote, ....."humans and human activity contribute  6 billion tons annually to the planet's Carbon Dioxide totals", by running the numbers we come up with some very interesting facts.   

Keeping in mind we are using estimates provided by the leftist group known as The Sierra Club and taking into account the agenda they have, it's not difficult to imagine they just may have jacked up their estimates.   Those of their ilk have been known to manipulate data and write computer programs to produce predetermined results.  Be that as it may, we used their data  and have come up with these results.

Here is some math:
6 billion tons divided by 186 billion tons = .032 x  100 = 3.2%
Which means, during any one year period man's contribution to Co2 levels is 3.2%

Now, let's say we are really concerned about cutting back on the "human carbon footprint", here is a game plan to save the planet.  Suppose.....
  • We eliminate half of the world population of 7.2 billion people to 3.6 billion.
  • We shut down half of the world's factories and industry.
  • We remove half of all cars, trains, trucks, tractors, ships and planes from use.
  • We close and shutter half of every fuel consuming building in the world, which would include businesses, schools, hospitals, government buildings (not a bad idea there), and of course half the homes on the planet.
Doing this would cut in half, man's carbon footprint for that year.
Man's yearly carbon footprint = 3.2% of the total
Removing half of human activity would reduce that total by .016 x 100 = 1.6%

 The average Co2 percentage is .0045% 
1.6% (man's adjusted contribution) of .0045 = .00072%
.0045% (-) .00072% = .00378%

What do these numbers mean?  Two things.  The first thing it proves, is if half of mankind and everything associated with it were removed from existence, the amount of Co2 would be reduced by .00072%.  
The second thing it proves is man-made global warming is nothing more than hoax and a sinister scheme to confiscate from the productive, skim off huge amounts and then distribute the stolen wealth to those who have not earned it.

Polar ice and sea levels:
Let's run the numbers on some of these global warming alarms.

  A.  We have been told that 12 cubic miles of Greenland's ice is melting away every year and that will cause the sea levels to rise by 24 feet.  Algore has warned, by the winter of 2014, there would be no ice on the north pole.  Since that breathlessly proffered prognostication has not exactly come to fruition as the northern hemisphere is suffering the coldest winter in over 100 years, they needed a new explanation to explain the falsity of the old one.  Enter, the Polar Vortex This, according to them, explains how global warming is forcing warm air up to the pole and the result is that frigid weather is being forced south.  There you have it, global warming is causing global freezing.  No word from Algore as to how a 2014 no ice covered north pole is able to freeze the entire northern hemisphere.  But he's working on it.

Now, back to the sea levels.  Let's run a few more numbers.  Greenland, at last estimate, has 604,800 cubic miles of ice.  
If, as they say, 12 cubic miles are melting every year, get your row boats ready, because at that rate it will take 50,400 years before it's all melted.  A bit deeper into the future than 2014.  One can never prepare too early so you may want to consider selling your beach front property, just to be safe, in say 25,000 years or so.

  B.  Of course, typical with most information the warming hoaxsters pretend to have calculated, this 24 foot rise is also much exaggerated.  We have done real and complete calculations based upon the world's connected waterways. Calculating the density of ice as compared to water and the total ice mass of the entire northern hemisphere.  What we found was the sea levels would rise just under 11 feet, but only after more than 2,500 generations, if it continued to melt at the rate they claim.  Which we see now, darn it, is just not happening.

Here is the basis, without showing all the calculations here, which you can do yourself or see ours upon request. There are 150,826,300 square miles of connected sea level bodies of water on this earth.  If every single particle of ice, in the entire northern hemisphere were to melt, the sea levels would rise just 19 feet.  This takes into account that large percentages of northern ice are incorporated in the oceans and seas.  Water volume increases by about 20% when frozen.  A large percentage of all melting ice resides in the oceans and seas and the volume would actually decrease where that is so. Those areas would actually see a negative rise in sea levels. 

 A little about what really causes global warming.  
Hint, its a big hot ball in the sky.
As we have shown, Co2 plays no role in planetary heating.  So what does?

Our planet is kept warm or cold by three major natural phenomenons.
   A. The Sun
   B. Ozone
   c. H2o (Water or more precisely, water vapor)

When the sun shines, it not only creates thermal heat which reaches the earth, but more importantly, solar particles crash into the oxygen in the upper atmosphere and creates OzoneThese solar particles vary in intensity as a result of sun activity known as solar flares.  The more active the solar flares, the more intense the particle collisions and the more Ozone is created.  Less solar activity, less Ozone.  Less Ozone = a cooler earth, more Ozone = a warmer earth.

Ozone is the number two rated greenhouse gas which follows the number one greenhouse gas, no its not Co2, its H20, humidity.   Ozone serves two major purposes.  
  1. The most important is its ability to filter harmful radiation from the sun.  Without it, all life on this planet would cease to exist.  
  2. The second is its ability to block echoed or bounced heat from leaving the earth and dissipating into outer space.
Ozone is very toxic to humans as well as viruses and bacteria, better know as germs.  It also has a very short life span as it breaks down into other elements less than 14 days after it's created.   Because of it's ability to kill germs and it's property of quick dissipation, hospitals and industry use it to disinfect entire operating rooms, laboratories  and buildings.

Bad news for man made global warming pirates:
The sun has fairly consistent cycles of solar flare activity with long and short periods of more and less activity.  The sun has been moving towards a less active period for several years now, and if patterns of the past continue, many years of less active solar flares are ahead.  Which in simple terms means, it's going to get cold.

As we continue to cool, as we have been doing for several years, you will need to decide if it's the Polar Vortex or the lack of a Solar Vortex.

February 2, 2014 ~TPATH






Without a doubt the best research data available








As at home in the ocean as seals and dolphins.

December 21, 2012 TPATH - Over these past decades we have been told that man is heating up the globe, melting the polar ice caps, raising the sea levels, growing the deserts and drowning polar bears.

They have tried everything under the sun, while ignoring the sun, to convince us that humankind is destroying the planet.  They have manipulated software programs when results did not conform to their ideology, then lied about the results and the manipulations.

Except for labeling us as stupid if we don't "just believe what they tell us"they have failed to produce even the smallest bit of evidence that proves this massive ecosystem is being changed by humans. The reason they have not, is they can't, there isn't any.

TPATH has, over these years, written to many of these so called scientists and asked them for the proof they claim they have.  We informed them that we were intelligent enough to understand any data they could show.

Well, of course TPATH never received anything close to proof.  A few told us that CO2 was cumulative and no matter how little man puts in the air, it stays there, and that's their proof.

Really? That is proof? Its not even factual.   A large amount of Carbon Dioxide is broken down everyday through plants using it, as well as many other chemicals that come in contact with it.

So what facts prove and dispel  the myth of man made global warming?  Its called mathematical common sense and is not derived from a pre-conceived outcome based computer manipulation.  

The proof we have is in the numbers and geological core samples, which have no agenda.  Just data and repeatable outcome.

Its certain that most people do not like
big numbers or small fractions.  

That is why the leftists feel they can fool you.  You see, they have looked at the numbers for you, so you don't have to.  All you have to do is believe what they tell you.  And then all you need do is pay the price, in carbon taxes and loss of your standard of living.

TPATH knows our readers are able to look at and understand numbers and fractions, so here they are.  They represent proof beyond any doubt that man has neither caused global warming nor could he do anything about it.

1. Humans produce approximately 6 billion tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) every year.  This sounds like an immense number and it would be if 6 billion tons of anything were dumped on your front lawn.  All of the speculation and fear mongering of the left, use that number to push the agenda.

2. The total amount of CO2 on the earth today is:
  41,120,000,000,000  (41 trillion tons)

3. The percentage of that amount, which humans are responsible for is:
     0.000145%  (that over 7 thousand times smaller than 1%)

4. The amount of CO2 in just the atmosphere is
    720,000,000,000 (720 billion tons)

5. Even if every bit of CO2 man creates, stayed in the atmosphere, which it does not, the percentage of the total amount would be:
   0.0083%  (that is over 120 times smaller than 1%)

6. Since 1901 until today, 110 years, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by:
 0.0007% (that is almost 1,430 times smaller than 1%)

7. If that rate continues and if man and not nature is responsible for the entire increase, it will take 1,425 years to increase the amount of CO2 in the air by 1%.

8. The total of 6 billion tons, referenced above, includes not only machinery and energy producing industry, but it also includes the CO2 breathed out by humans.  In fact, it includes everything related to the human existence. This fact is conveniently left out when the left reports the CO2 tonnage spoiling the atmosphere.

9. If half of the world's population disappeared, and half the cars, trucks, trains, planes, factories, power plants, houses, schools and office buildings, were also to miraculously disappear for one year, the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere would be reduced by: 
0.00415%  ( that is 240 times less than 1%) 

10. Core samples prove that CO2 has very little relationship to global temperatures.  Many periods of earth's history have had much higher levels of CO2 than today but had much colder temperatures.  

11. For something to be a scientific fact it must be provable and it must be repeatable.  Since global temperatures have been recorded sometimes higher and sometimes lower based on a specific CO2 percentage, CO2 can not be considered as the cause. 

In conclusion, humans are incapable of controlling, causing or changing the ecosystem of this planet. That is a mathematical certainty.  The CO2 humans contribute to the atmosphere has less impact on the total amount than adding a teaspoon of water to an Olympic sized swimming pool would have.

What is also a certainty, is that any mathematician or scientist who tells you anything else, is lying.  Some of them may want to believe  so strongly that the outcome of their thinking is just as flawed as the outcome of a manipulated software program.

The sooner we let all the thieves pushing this hoax know that we are onto them, the longer we will be able to hold onto our wallets. 

 Global Warming is all about stealing from the productive.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.

December 21, 2012 TPATH



Press Release
November 25, 2012



68% of Registered Republicans Would Support a Viable Third Party

November 25, 2012 -TPATH- As a result of the growing frustration with the direction our country has taken, there appears to be a strong feeling in this country that neither of the two major parties represent any viable ability to get America on the right track.

TPATH has just completed a non-scientific poll but the results should be of interest to every person involved in this country's political environment. Information on the basics and workings of this poll are listed at the bottom of this release.


Should America consider forming a viable third party for registered voters who feel neither of the two major parties represent their views and ideology?


69% Registered Republicans

2% Registered Democrats

21% Registered Independents or Unaffiliated

8% Constitution, American or Conservative Party


Republicans - 68% Voted YES (32% Voted No)

Democrats - 100% Voted YES

Independents - 92% Voted YES

Conservatives - 99% Voted YES

Mechanics of this poll:

  1. Name, state, party affiliation and email address were required.

  2. Only one vote per registered voter was allowed.

  3. Redundant votes from emails were deleted unless a different name was associated with it.

  4. Some people voted for both positions in error. Those votes were deleted and not included in any totals.

  5. Votes came in from many states, as far as Hawaii and California, but 82% came from the North East.

  6. No attempt was made to verify affiliation of those taking part in the poll.

  7. Poll was posted on for 7 days and promoted on updates from TPATH and other groups affiliated with TPATH.


For more information please contact Dwight Kehoe


732 741 2837


TPATH thanks Jerry Stith and Joan Swirsky for this contribution.


July 19, 2011 

100 Milestone Documents

These documents have changed the course of history.
Some of them are great pieces of work
Others: Not So Much

TPATH thanks Jerry Stith and Joan Swirsky for this contribution.

The following is a list of 100 milestone documents, compiled by the National Archives and Records Administration, and drawn primarily from its nationwide holdings. The documents chronicle United States history from 1776 to 1965.
Why Were these 100 Documents Chosen?


Complete List of Documents

Please note that you can always use the thumbnail images at the top of every page to navigate directly to any of the 100 Milestone Documents.




Here are 252 Reasons why
Obama is the worst President
Most Prolific Liar
The White House Has Ever Seen


Can America take much more of this?

February 6, 2012 (TPATH)
- #Obama has declared he has done enough to be rewarded with another term.  Really? 

Shall we count the ways?  Here are just a few of his accomplishments during the past 3 years.  As one reads this we tend to agree that he should have another term, but should it be Leavenworth or Riker's Island.

1.  He has ceased oil production in the Gulf of Mexico, which put or kept over 12,000 people out of work.

2. He gave tax payer dollars to Brazil so they could drill for oil.

3. He refused to allow a pipeline from Canada which would help our dependency on Middle East Oil and create a minimum of 20,000 jobs.

4. He encouraged the EPA to increase regulations on coal fired power plants which has increased the cost of electricity.

5. He has bowed to Arab kings while disrespecting our allies such as Isreal and Great Britain.

6. He stopped production uranium to fuel our power plants which has created a shortage and caused an increase in electric rates.

7. He has refused to make any real cuts in government spending except for $500 billion cuts in the military while our enemies are growing their war machines at a rate higher than anytime in history.

8. He has stopped the building of fences on our border while pushing for amnesty for illegals.

9. He has sued several states for trying to protect their people from illegal immigration.

10. He has directed his people to call the murders of our American soldiers on America soil, a "work place shooting" when it was done by a Muslim terrorist.

11. He presided over "Fast and Furious" which allegedly forced dealers to sell guns to Mexican drug lords so he could blame the US Constitution and as a result hundreds have died including a US Border Agent.

12. He has given billions of tax payer dollars to environmental companies even though he knew they were going to go bankrupt.

13. He bankrupted real investors while bailing out unions in the General Motors fiasco.

14. He forced a health care bill on the American people that will bankrupt most private health care services and force people to buy a product they may not want.

15. He cut Medicare by $500 billion dollars and blamed Republicans for wanting to destroy the Medicare.

16. He has spent millions of dollars trying to hide his past from the American people.

17. He uses the Executive Order to make law outside the executive branch which is unconstitutional.

18. He arrogantly issued a birth certificate that is a clear and proven forgery.

19, He made recess appointments when the Senate was not in recess which violates the Constitution.

20. He continues to create class warfare and resentment between the people of this country.

21. He has spent an average of $1 trillion dollars more than the budget every year since being in office.

22. He is responsible for millions of job losses and the highest sustained unemployment rate since the great depression.

23. He has increased the amount of people on food stamps to the highest number in history.

24.He has been using a Social Security number that failed the Government's E-Verify System.

25. He has presided over a home owner crisis which he voted to create and then blames the Republicans

26. He continues to print more and more money which has created inflation that destroys the life savings of the retired and creates finical burdens on the poorer communities.

27. He has encouraged the #occupy movement that has cost tax payers over $30 million dollars and growing.

28. He has increased the national debt to $15.6 trillion dollars which has increased during his 3 years more than all the other presidents combined.

29. He has sent hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to the middle east to refurbish Mosques.
One question for anyone who is thinking of voting #Obama into a second term.

Which one of these accomplishments do you want more of?

February 6, 2012 (TPATH)

By “energy policies” I mean his administration’s opposition to access to the billions of barrels of oil on federal lands.

I mean his Energy Secretary’s earlier opinion that high gas prices are good for the economy, abandoned as they climb to and passed $4.

I mean Obama’s lies about the recent increase in oil production when he knows it is occurring on private and state owned land, not federal land.

I mean his opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline.

I mean the waste of billions of taxpayer’s dollars on “renewable energy” firms, many of which have already failed, along with the sales of the Chevy Volt, whose production has been discontinued.

I mean two amendments to the Senate transportation bill that would have created new taxpayer-funded subsidies for natural gas vehicles, extended the production tax credit to underwrite wind energy, and revived the Treasury grant program that gives taxpayer money for the installation of solar panels and other renewable technologies.

I mean the impact his policies are having on everyone’s wallet and its drag on the economy as his policies drive up the cost of gasoline and everything dependent on transporting goods anywhere…and that is everything!

Just how dumb do you have to be not to grasp that when Obama took office on January 20, 2009, oil was selling at $38.74 a barrel and the average retail price of gasoline was around $1.90 a gallon. Today, oil is trading at more than $108 a barrel and gasoline is closing in on $4.00 a gallon. As they say, do the math.

In early March, speaking in Nashua, New Hampshire, Barack Obama said, “Let’s put every single member of Congress on record. You can stand with oil companies or you can stand up for the American people.” This consummate liar is using the same pathetic message and damage done by Jimmy Carter---who got voted out of office after a single term as president.

In his 2005 book, “Why Your Gasoline Prices are High”, Seldon B. Graham, Jr, a graduate of West Point, used his fifty years of experience in the oil industry described what happened when, in 1981, Congress passed a windfall profits tax. “It was a death notice for USA oil. Many U.S. oil and gas companies went bankrupt…and those which survived were forced to go overseas to explore and drill in foreign countries.”

At the very time when the Middle East is in turmoil, the Democrats want to repeat the same blunder of 1981.

In a nation that sits atop billions of barrels of untapped oil in federal lands such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, domestic oil reserves in the lower 48 states, the Gulf of Mexico, and the vast untapped reserves off the nation’s continental coasts, the Obama administration has restricted oil companies from exploring and drilling in areas where new reserves of oil and gas are known to exist, shortened lease terms, and has slowed down permit approvals.

That is the equivalent of declaring an energy war on the nation. Moreover, in a virtual secret, the Obama State Department is involved in a deal to turn over seven Alaskan islands to Russia. One of them is the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined and who knows how much oil lies beneath them?

Oil prices are set by the market principles of supply and demand. By aggressively thwarting access to America’s abundant oil reserves, the Obama administration is deliberately keeping prices high and forcing them higher.

As Jack Gerard, the president of the American Petroleum Institute, said in a press conference on March 8, “When crude prices are high, the price at the pump is also high. With a 42-gallon barrel of crude oil topping $106, refiners pay more than $2.50 for each gallon of crude they must purchase. Add in the almost 50 cents per gallon on average in gasoline taxes and you have over $3.00 of what consumers are now paying at the pump.”

Simply by announcing his intent to open new areas for exploration and production, President Obama could signal the market and put downward pressure on today’s and tomorrow’s gasoline prices. This is exactly what happened when President Bush lifted the moratorium on the East and West Outer Continental Shelf back in July 2008. It resulted in a 12% decline in the price per barrel.

Why are we paying more? Why are U.S. dollars going to oil-producing nations that do not like America? Why are we competing for oil with China, India and other emerging economies when we have enough oil, gas, and coal to be energy independent for the next century or longer?

The reason is the policies of the present and past administrations going back to the days of Jimmy Carter in the 1970s. The answer given by the White House is greedy oil companies and Wall Street “speculators.” It is a lie.

The worst of it, as a recent Wall Street Journal article explained, “Oil can’t go much higher without derailing the economy…at some point, oil prices overwhelm everyone,” wrote Liam Denning. Keeping them artificially high can have no other purpose than to continue the destruction of the nation and the President knows it.


There is something we can

Anecdote and Facts By:
Dwight Kehoe
Editor TPATH

March 2, 2014 ~TPATH~ Several months ago a group of us took a trip up to central Jersey where we took a concealed carry course.  It took about 4 hours and despite my feeling that as a member of a rifle club, the NRA and having successfully passed high powered rifle courses, I was fairly versed in this subject, I learned a few things.

The course was presented by a group called  "GUN FOR HIRE".  The instructors were all either active police officers or retired.  This is not an ad for them, but if anyone is looking for a great group of people to help them through the registration process for many states, these are the guys.  By the way, this course enabled us to get concealed carry permits for over 40 states.  Of course, one of the states that do not recognize your rights, is my own, the People's Republic of New Jersey.

Getting back to the course we took that day, the classroom was filled with over 50 people.  They appeared to be from all walks of life, from construction workers  to professionals and from the looks of many of them, like myself, retired people. Clearly though, as disparate our vocations may have been, everyone taking this course had to be Constitutionally minded conservatives.  Well, almost all.

During a break, my good friend, who will remain anonymous for this article, not intentionally so, but managed to find the one flaming lib in the crowd.  If we could have imagined there would be a lefty there, it would not have been difficult to pick this guy out the first try in a  game of "Pick Out the Lib".  This loner, standing off by himself,  eyes glaring out the window at the environmental terrorist mowing the lawn,  appeared surly, prune faced, angry and disgruntled.

Not to be deterred  by first impressions, my friend meandered over and struck up a conversation with him.  Almost as quickly as Obama can create a falsehood, the fireworks began.  I approached the verbal confrontation in time to hear the lib calling my friend a "
purveyor of lies".  Libs like to talk like that.

It seems that the conversation had moved to who committed gun crimes, such as mass murder and assassinations.  Not knowing to what extent this guy was radical, disgruntled or unbalanced, I extricated him from my pal by enticing him over to the free donuts.  Works every time.

Just in case anyone, including our new concealed carry leftist, who may think what my friend said was not factual, here is a very interesting list.  It speaks for itself.  Donuts anyone?

 In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States .
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States, who later died from the wound.

 In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
 In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
 In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
 In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
 In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
 In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
 In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria.
 In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
 In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
 In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
 In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
 In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
 In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
 In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
 In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
 As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
Note if you will, there are no, conservatives, no Constitutionalists, and God forbid, not one single Tea Party member on this list.

Thanks to one of TPATH's readers for doing the research and providing this list.  He did not give permission to use his name, so we will not.
Contact TPATH   HERE







A special thanks to Mr. Bill Haney of the West Jersey Tea Party for gathering all the contact and other information you will need.

If you have not been able to keep up with who your legislators are or what district the latest gerrymandering has placed you in, here is a link that will give you all the information you need to keep in touch with your individual scoundrels. 

Please bookmark this link once you get there.  Its very possible we may need to contact them again.

Need to be kept up on all the important issues?

New Jersey Assembly
Officially Schedules Massive Attack
on Gun Rights 

 More than 20 Extremist Anti-Gun Measures
to be Heard  on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
 in Trenton

New Jersey State Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee:

Assemblyman Charles Mainor
(201) 536-7851

Assemblyman Gilbert Wilson
 (856) 547-4800

Assemblyman Nelson Albano 
(609) 465-0700

Assemblyman Daniel Benson
 (609) 631-0198

Assemblyman Sean Connors
(201) 795-9190

Assemblyman Joseph Cryan
(908) 624-0880

Assemblyman Sean Kean
                                                               (732) 974-0400                                                              

Assemblyman Gregory McGuckin
                                                               (732) 840-9028                                                            

Assemblyman Erik Peterson
                                                              (908) 238-0251                                                              

Assemblyman David Rible
                                                                 (732) 974-0400                                                               

Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman
(609) 292-0500




ON JULY 1, 2012

Article I, Section 7 of the US Constitution

TPATH and Nick Purpura are in the process of getting each of the State Attorneys General who were signed onto the Obamacare lawsuit to entertain not giving up on this important issue.

We feel that Justice Roberts, knowingly or not, by issuing a decision which declares Obamacare a TAX bill, has deemed it unconstitutional.

The following letter has been sent to all 26 of those AG's.
We will let you know when and if we get a response.


July 1, 2012

Dear State Attorney General,
The Supreme Court ruling this past week which declared the bill known as Obamacare to be constitutional was as shocking as it was egregious.  If the Republicans do not get control of the Senate and or if Obama is re-elected, this country may never recover from the scope and breadth of this bill.

It will do no good to spend any time wondering why Justice Roberts ruled as he did.  Nor will it serve any endeavor to use valuable time name calling and venting.  What we need is a plan, beyond the expectations of November, and we need to implement it quickly.  

I just finished watching three state AG's on Huckabee's Fox program (you know who you are) as they discussed possible plans for continuing the fight.  It had been my hope that Article I of the Constitution would come up and be discussed. Alas, it did not. As a result TPATH has decided to contact each of the 26 State AG's in an effort to get some attention on the breach of Article I, Section 7.

As each of you are aware, this ruling can be challenged if it is done so with in 30 days of the ruling.  That will give you until Friday, July 27th to join together with a formal appeal and official notification.  From what I understand, an appeal can be made provided there is new evidence which was not considered or litigated during the process.

The basis for new evidence was produced by none other than Chief Justice Roberts, himself.  His opinion and ruling that  the healthcare bill was a tax bill, brought new evidence to the law suit. In fact, its now the law.  SCOTUS says its a tax bill.  So, its a tax bill.

It is the opinion of TPATH as well as all of our researchers and contributors, immediately upon ruling Obamacare a tax bill, Roberts could have and probably should have, ruled it unconstitutional under the constraints of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution.

Just a small review of the history of the Senate Healthcare bill which is the one being challenged.  This bill was written and produced by the Senate and by use of reconciliation passed it on to Obama's desk.  So not only was this bill not produced by the the House of Representatives as required by Article I, Section 7, but it was never voted on by the full House.

The bottom line is, the Healthcare Bill was deemed unconstitutional, in its entirety, the instant that Roberts declared it a tax bill.  Taxes cannot be raised by the US Senate.   

TPATH hopes you will take this into consideration.  This fight to save America from this over reach of the Federal Government, is not over.  

Dwight Kehoe

July 1, 2012 TPATH
(A PDF file from John Anthony)

February 17, 2012

February 14, 2012 TPATH  - As many of you know, the Jersey Shore Tea Party Patriots have been in a long battle to get the US Supreme Court to accept their lawsuit against ObamaCare.

Nicholas Purpura has asked that as many people as possible, across this country, know that tomorrow is so very important for more than just the ObamaCare bill.  Nic's suit is based upon Obama's eligibility and would be the most effective path to ending this attack on our Constitution.

Basically, whether or not the suit, 11-7275, is accepted, is now in God's hands.  Nic has asked that we pray this night for the Justices to do the right thing and accept this suit.

TPATH, while having faith in the Lord as much as almost anyone, feels that a few phone calls to the Supreme Court can't hurt.

This could be the turning point. If 11-7275 is heard,

  • General Inquiry: 202-479-3000
  • Public Information Office: 202-479-3211, Reporters press 1
  • Clerk's Office: 202-479-3011
  • Visitor Information Line: 202-479-3030
  • Opinion Announcements: 202-479-3360

No. 11-7275    
Nicholas E. Purpura, et al., Petitioners
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
Docketed:    November 9, 2011
Lower Ct:    United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.:    (11-2303)
  Decision Date:    September 29, 2011

~~~Date~~~     ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 31 2011     Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2011)
Nov 25 2011     Request for recusal received from petitioner
Dec 9 2011     Waiver of right of respondents Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 15 2011     DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2012.
Jan 9 2012     Petition DENIED.
Jan 16 2012     Petition for Rehearing filed.
Feb 1 2012     DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2012.

Attorneys for Petitioners:        
Nicholas E. Purpura    1802 Rue de la Port Drive    
    Wall, NJ  07719    
Party name: Nicholas E. Purpura, et al.

Attorneys for Respondents:        
Donald B. Verrilli Jr.    Solicitor General    (202) 514-2217
    United States Department of Justice    
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.    
    Washington, DC  20530-0001

Party name: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

February 16, 2012 TPATH

Request from Judge Malihi
February 1, 2012

Types of Social Security cards

Some interesting information on Social Security Numbers
Provided by Gary Wilmott

Three different types of Social Security cards are issued. The most common type contains the cardholder's name and number. Such cards are issued to U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents. There are also two restricted types of Social Security cards:

  • One reads "not valid for employment." Such cards cannot be used as proof of work authorization, and are not acceptable as a List C document on the I-9 form.
  • The other reads "valid for work only with DHS authorization." These cards are issued to people who have temporary work authorization in the U.S. They can satisfy the I-9 requirement, if they are accompanied by a work authorization card.

In 2004 Congress passed The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act; parts of which mandated that the Social Security Administration redesign the Social Security Number (SSN) Card to prevent forgery. From April 2006 through August, 2007, Social Security Administration (SSA) and Government Printing Office (GPO) employees were assigned to redesign the Social Security Number Card to the specifications of the Interagency Task Force created by the Commissioner of Social Security in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security.

The new SSN card design utilizes both covert and overt security features created by the SSA and GPO design teams.

[edit] Identity theft

Many citizens and privacy advocates are concerned about the disclosure and processing of Social Security numbers. Furthermore, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have demonstrated an algorithm which uses publicly available personal information to reconstruct a given SSN.[17]

The SSN is frequently used by those involved in identity theft, since it is interconnected with so many other forms of identification, and because people asking for it treat it as an authenticator. The SSN is generally required by financial institutions to set up bank accounts, credit cards, and obtain loans, partially because it is assumed that no one except the person to whom it was issued will know it.

Exacerbating the problem of using the social security number as an identifier is the fact that the social security card contains no biometric identifiers of any sort, making it essentially impossible to tell whether a person using a certain SSN is truly the person to whom it was issued without relying on some other means of documentation (which may itself have been falsely procured through use of the fraudulent SSN). Congress has proposed federal laws that will restrict the use of SSNs for identification and ban their use for a number of commercial purposes, e.g. rental applications.[18]

Gary M. Wilmott


Tim Adams' 106 Page Thesis

Discourse and Conflict: The President Barak H.
Obama Birth Certificate Controversy and the New

Timothy Lee Adams
Western Kentucky University,


Will Obama Be Vetted for Eligibility in 2012?
Roseanne Catalano
Director- Division of Elections
107 West Gaines St.
Collins Building – Suite 224
Tallahassee, Fl 32399-1050
atriots, tea party, constitution, elections,Brad Thor, debt ceiling, national debt, congress, lower taxes, gadsden flags, smaller government, government spending, natural resources, Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, Rich Perry, Republican, conservative, banners, pins, flags, bumper stickers, yard signs, pledge of allegiance, states rights, 2nd Amendment, gun rights, flat tax, fair tax, irs,

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT INFORMATION! Sorry for the "document dump" but finally I got all the pieces and could put it together for you. Please read immediately the first four (1-4) subsections below about the State Plan and the North Jersey Regional Transportation Plan.

1. Public Input Sessions on the NJ Draft State Development and Redevelopment Plan. This is IT. What we have been reading and researching and training for. You and all your friends and neighbors and group members are needed. This plan will affect EVERY CITIZEN of this state whether they think it will or not. 
See attachment "Findings on the NJ Redevelopment Plan" for talking points.

Bring people! Bring cameas that video! Bring an easy-to-read hand-carried smallish sign (11x17") -- something like "This Is A Rigged Process" "NJ Is Being Railroaded" "Stop The Plan: It's A Land Grab" "NJ Plan: Wolf In Green Clothing" "Your Property Is At Risk" "Equal Justice Not Social Justice", etc.
WATCH THIS training video on resisting the Delphi by Heather Gass, East Bay Tea Party.

READ THE PRESENTATION attached, "Resist the Delphi"

If you haven't read the draft state plan yet, here are links to the documents:

Please pick the closest 2 citizen input sessions and attend them in the next three weeks:

2. MORE to look at in the Draft State Plan: The Priority "Investment" Criteria

The same document will be available shortly at under the Draft Final Plan Text section.

Attached to this email you will find an Advance Notice of Rules for the "Priority Investment Criteria" illustrated in the Draft Final State Strategic Plan and recently discussed with the State Planning Commission at its meeting on January 18, 2012. The public can provide written comment on this document by Monday April 2, 2012 or at any of the upcoming public hearings related to the Draft Final State Strategic Plan.  

The OPA wants us to provide comment on the draft state plan, the draft infrastructure needs assessment, and this too, by April 2. Notice of this just went out a couple of days ago. The Criteria were recently discussed with the State Planning Commission at its meeting on January 18, 2012. 


3. For those of you in Monmouth County:
Monmouth County Planning Board to discuss State Plan

The Monmouth County Planning Board under the chairmanship of Vincent  Domidion, will discuss the Proposed final draft of the State Plan: New Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan, dated October 11, 2011., on February 21, 2012 at 2 pm at the Hall Of Records Annex, 1-E.Main Street, Freedhold, NJ



The program requires contracts between Rutgers and the Freeholders/county to get the HUD money. The HUD grant terms require smart growth. Because your county signed a contract YOU the taxpayer now have your rights signed away for you.

Well the joke's on them this time. Note on Page 14 in the lower center boxes appear the 3 E's of UN AGENDA 21: Economy, Environment and Equity..

GOT 'EM!   

You'll also be shocked, I tell ya, shocked! to learn that the $5MM grant for the North Jersey Regional Transportation Plan won't be divided up equally among the 13 counties and 5 towns.

The 5 towns are: Elizabeth, Newark, New Brunswick, Jersey City, Paterson,
Check out Page 18 - the "governance council" - to see how your new government will work. YOU are not represented. This will supplant your county. Ignore the silly statement on Slide  7 that this is not a top-down mandate. It IS because the HUD grant requires certain criteria and decisions. Once you "SIGN DE PAPERS" you have lost your ability to govern your town. You have lost your sovereignty.
Check out the timeline on Page 22 - your new regional (soviet) government will adopt bylaws by April. GOODBYE Sovereignty April 2012.

Don't believe me? Look at the HUD NOFA 2011 document. The goals starting on Page 1 will begin to scare the life out of you. HUD flat-out states: "HUD seeks grantees that envision and work toward sustainable communities, and provides a number of strategies to do so in the Strategic Plan:"


So the State Development Plan isn't Agenda 21? It's WHOLLY Agenda 21! The proof is above.



The APA (American Planning Association) is so scared of the growing opposition to Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, etc. that they have released a pdf explaining how to deal with these issues using different jargon, etc. Read through the pdf it will help you and your group when you attend a planning meeting. The planners are trying to change the game, but we are on to them.

Let me guess! It's for our "safety"!

New Jersey Threatened with Mandatory Water Fluoridation - Science and Residents Ignored

Despite objections from environmentalists and utility officials, New Jersey is under threat of mandatory fluoridation, which is the addition of fluoride chemicals into the public drinking water ostensibly to reduce tooth decay. Despite admission by the Federal Government that American children are fluoride over-exposed and that fluoride's benefits are primarily topical, New Jersey legislators are crafting a law that will force fluoridation on the entire state, reports the Fluoride Action Network (FAN).


You are encouraged to invite family, friends and neighbors to these open public forums with the Governor.  Please attend and show your support as well as bringing your questions and concerns to the event.

WHEN:       Monday, February 13                   
                   Doors Open at 2:30PM

                   Anticipated Start time 3:00PM                                               
               WHERE:      Caldwell Community Center
                                    1 Provost Square
                                    Caldwell, NJ 07006

Seating is on a first come, first serve basis and open to the public, but please RSVP by clicking


EPA Grants Award Process Webinar Announcement

The Office of Grants and Debarment is pleased to announce that it is hosting another EPA Grants Award Process Webinar for our external grants community! We'd appreciate it if you could pass this information along to anyone you think might be interested. Please note that registration is limited.

Event: EPA Grants Award Process Webinar

Date: February 23, 2012
Time: 2pm ET
Description: EPA's Office of Grants and Debarment is hosting a webinar for the EPA grants community. The webinar will cover grants management topics, including: how to find and apply for grant opportunities; FFATA reporting requirements; and preparing a proper budget detail. In addition, we will be hosting a Q&A session during the second half of the webinar. If you have any questions, please email it to in advance of the call. We will cover as many questions as possible during the session.

For more information and to register:



9. The upcoming Rio+20 in June is showing every sign of being deadly to the world economy and to your liberty.


United Nations - WORLD EXCLUSIVE: UN chief, aides plot 'green economy' agenda at upcoming summit

By George Russell

Published February 09, 2012

I will send this out separately - this is big and we'll need to have an organized response before the June meeting.


10. This is what the globalists really think of us and our private property:

“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” -Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project, Miami Dade Clerk of Courts

“We must make this place an insecure and inhospitable place for Capitalists and their projects – we must reclaim the roads and plowed lands, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness tens of millions of acres or presently settled land.” -Dave Foreman, Earth First.”

Do you wonder any more why there is global unrest and no government seems able to find a solution to the problem?  Why all efforts to "fix" the problems only make them worse? This is by design, according to the plan: UN AGENDA 21.



Shelly Kennedy Cummins

AgEnders NJ
Bayshore TEA Party
Twitter  @AgEndersNJ    @Bayshore_TParty

--- On Sat, 2/11/12:

And our President has once again issued another EO to promote Agenda 21.  WHAT ARE WE PREPARED TO DO AT THIS TIME TO STOP THIS???  Suggestions welcome.  But we MUST do something BIG before JUNE.

As if this was not bad enough here is yet some more
For those of us that completely understand the dangers of Agenda 21 also realize the biggest threat to our Constitution is the United Nations.  Which if you really understand what is happening must also admit that EVERYTHING that is failing in our country today has its roots in the UN and Agenda 21.  With this said it is vitally important that whoever we back for President must realize the American people DEMAND that the US totally withdraws from the UN.  No money, no participation no nothing!!  There is one candidate that has worked to remove the US from the UN for years.  You all know that candidate to be Ron Paul.  If you do not support Ron Paul I implore you to start delivering the message to the candidate you do support that the #1 issue to us is the withdrawal of the US from the UN.

With this said just read what the UN is planning for the Rio Summit.  The plot has been revealed folks and we need to start contacting the campaigns and making these candidate know that we DEMAND a complete withdrawal from the UN.  I had the opportunity to ask Newt Gingrich this question and I was told he had no intention of withdrawing the US from the UN.  He wanted to change the relationship but no response  "WRONG ANSWER SIR."  But according to many vetting surveys I have seen the only candidate that agrees with a complete withdrawal of the US from the UN is Ron Paul.  This is one of the main reasons I am behind him.  But again, whoever you support PLEASE start letting them know the importance of this issue to the future of America and our Constitution.

Agenda 21 Repackaged Socialism is Unsustainable.  This is an excellent article that puts it all into perspective.

Agenda 21 has just about destroyed the fishing industry in America and it is a part of the agenda we need to learn about and discuss.  Do you know that 85% of our fish no longer come from American fisherman.  We get most of our fish from foreign companies.  If you knew how these fish were raised you would never eat fish again.   Makes me glad I am a vegetarian.   In the meantime our fishing industry is just about non-existent.  We have not been able to fish salmon for almost 2 years and many other species have been severely decreased.  

I sent this out a couple of days ago but want to make sure everyone sees it .  The APA is rewriting the language.  We are on to them so now they have to change their words to once again hide the truth from the public.  


Prepared and Submitted by
Shelly Kennedy Cummins
November14, 2011

Many people have heard about new strategies to combat the globalism at our door which is called UN Agenda 21. Some of you may only have snippets of information about these, and it's important to get all this information out. Attached are some documents presenting in overall terms several  strategies which might be used separately or together, comprising an Activist Strategy Toolset. This is meant to complement, not replace, any other information or training you are receiving from Karen Bracken, John Anthony, or others on these topics. This information is intended to give you a "heads up" to identify possible strategies applicable to your area, and where you might follow up for more information.

1. Sustainable Development Flier: 2-page Overview of A21
2. Petition to Withdraw from ICLEI - Petition form to members of a City Council to withdraw from ICLEI
3. Bonner Cty Property Rights council - Explanation of the Property Rights council concept
4. What Is coordination - Explanation of what the coordination process is
5. Coordination Process Federal Statutory Authority - Explanation of how the law allows and in fact mandates federal coordination with local governments.

* For more information on coordination: Contact Fred Kelly Grant,
* For more information on property rights councils: Contact Karen Bracken,
* For a formal presentation on UN Agenda 21 which can be shown to elected officials, go to one of the two links shown below: (all downloads are from my TransferBigFiles page and are free of viruses)
This link to download the PowerPoint file with narration:

False Choices A21 Voiceover -Officials 14m Show.ppsx

Or go to this link to download two PDF files with the identical content in the above narrated presentation, only without the voice-over:  one file contains slides only, the other contains slides with notes.

https://www.transferbigfiles. com/c610f5af-39ab-4031-863a- eb5fe0453076?rid= F5ECtoKxTiVCbDDZz8KTHA2
  • AGENDA 21 for Public Officials - pdf slides.pdf
  • AGENDA 21 for Public Officials - pdf notes.pdf







Shelly Kennedy Cummins

Bayshore TEA Party
AgEnders NJ



The following is from drkatesview
As we move from one dramatic diversion of Obama’s life story or unconstitutional antics to another, there is some very serious stuff going on in yours and my back yard.  Its called Agenda 21—the stealth plan of the New World Order to inventory and control every piece of land in and the water supply of the United States.

Just walk down your street and you will see who all is involved in this ‘feel good’ plan:

    your city, town, and rural county government including their waste management and water supply, land use, and planning departments;
    the local schools, at every level;
    your local parks and recreation department, agriculture,  and fish/wildlife/game departments
     local and national non-governmental organizations (NGO) involved in land, water or environmental issues
    State and/or federal natural resource management agencies.
    Your Chamber of Commerce

The NWO has provided the education for the ones who teach our children today from pre-school all the way through college and graduate school.  Our law schools have already been infected with disdain for and ignorance of the Constitution, aka, limits placed on the federal government in the Constitution.

Article I Section 8, restricts the Congress to (a)”the commerce clause”, i.e., ‘regulating commerce’ with foreign nations, among the states, and with all the Indian Tribes’; and (b) to exercise its authority over the D.C. and lands purchased from the States for ‘necessary government buildings’.  The word regulate means to ‘make regular’.  The abuse of the Commerce Clause by Congress is manifested in increased regulation that fosters centralized control over natural resource management and use decisions. It is through this avenue of environmental and land use regulation that the NWO inserts Agenda 21 as the controlling paradigm for American communities, mega-regions, and bio-regions.

May 30, 2012 TPATH


TPATH- (Tea Party Advocate Tracking Hub) is not a Tea Party.  TPATH does not have or recruit membership. TPATH will hold no meetings, organize no rallies or demonstrations but it will be our duty to help Patriots organize and get their events attended.  Our mission is to help keep every Patriot informed about the issues which concern all freedom loving Americans.

It will be our goal to not only give everyone a central location where they can link to Tea Party group home pages and Facebooks, but  TPATH will endeavor to provide links to important news items every day while including the occasional interesting video or story.  We will work to make your visit to our site, pleasant, informative and entertaining.

Any Patriot group or individual with a web site or Facebook Page, wishing to be linked to TPATH, please send your URL to "LINK ME" at
Tea Party Advocate   Leftists, America haters and Progressives, please do not apply.

TPATH will never ask users to donate or help support our effort.  Our mission is to help in some small way, save America from the evils of socialism by helping coordinate and communicate with like minded Patriots.  However, TPATH does have ads which help support the cost of what we do.  If our visitors support those advertisers, that would be helpful.

TPATH will provide a location for posting of articles, links, letters or information.  To have your article or letter posted please send it to
"TPATH-Postings"  here.  Tea Party Advocate
Please understand that all postings will be evaluated for pertinence to our movement or  entertainment value.

While TPATH has no "membership" we do require help from anyone wishing to join our effort to keep patriots informed.  TPATH needs researchers and information gathering help.  TPATH will use many resources to keep our website informative and updated.  To sign up as a TPATH Contributor please sign up at "Contribute" here. Tea Party Advocate

TPATH will provide an "Announcement Service" beyond the Meetings page listings. If your group needs to contact, through email and or special Posting, please send your event to "Help My Event" here.
Tea Party Advocate  TPATH will contact our huge address book and post your event, with graphics and information, on our Special Events page.  Leftists, marxists, progressives and leeches, don't even think about it.

Never will TPATH  email addresses in open cc nor will TPATH ever share, sell or make available any email address in our account. This is a a resolute promise to all.