BBQ FUNDRAISER THIS SUNDAY
A TPATH APPROVED EVENT
CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP
Candidate for State Assembly
May 17, 2013 TPATH - The upcoming Republican Primary election (June 4th) here in New Jersey is beginning to look like a very exciting time. As many of you know, people here in this state have awakened to the perils of the moderate Republicans and the progressive left. A few have gone beyond the awakening and have stepped up to the plate and decided that enough is enough. These patriotic Republican Americans are taking on the GOP establishment under the heading of Conservative Republican Leadership.
The Conservative Republican Leadership candidates in Legislative District 13 are proving to be a big concern for the GOP's backroom good ole' boys. Edna Walsh, as well as Leigh Ann Bellew, are making an impact to the point where the Monmouth County GOP is becoming quite aggressive. Expensive push polls designed to twist facts and costly mailings of equally misleading dirty tricks abound. They must be worried. And they should be.
This Sunday, May 19th at 4:00 pm, one of the most able and promising candidates New Jersey has seen in many, many years, Edna Walsh, is having a BBQ Fundraising event. Edna is running for the Assembly in NJ District 13. Please visit her Facebook Page for more information on her and what she stands for.
This is an open invitation to all concerned conservative citizens, regardless of which district you reside in. If you are ready to help Edna move our party and our state in the right direction, please take some time to stop by, meet Edna and other Conservative Republican Leadership candidates.
While this is a fundraiser which is desperately needed to offset the GOP money machine, please understand this is going to be a great day of seeing old friends and meeting new ones. If you have not met Edna, as of yet, TPATH promises you will be very impressed. If you meet her, you will vote for her.
So, if you come, remember, any donation, large or small will be greatly appreciated.
Dear State Lawmaker,
During the past several months I have attended a few of the hearings held in the capitol as one committee after another sat in judgement of my rights as an American citizen and debated as to what extent they would unconstitutionally infringe on the Bill of Rights.
During those hearings I sat quietly in the crowd or reviewed video records after the fact. I listened as great patriots and Americans testified, provided anecdotal apologues, and proffered irrefutable statistics and data in support of the 2nd Amendment.
The testimony was heartfelt and delivered with variations of justifiable anger and some with more stoic thoughtfulness. But regardless of the content or the manner in which it was presented, one thing is perfectly clear. Not one of you who voted to pass yet more unconstitutional law, ever intended to listen, comprehend or consider one word of testimony.
In fact on a few occasions, the legislators who work for we the people, in blatant displays of arrogance, held side conversations during statements from the citizens. And at one hearing it was announced that the committee would vote on the new legislation, before hearing from the people.
So I had to ask myself......., If these people can hear, read about and then truly analyze all the statistics which prove, beyond any doubt that America is safer in places where the 2nd Amendment has not been violated, and know of all the writings and beliefs of our Founding Fathers relating to the right of every law abiding citizen to protect himself and others, and then ignore it all and vote to further endanger me and my family....... are they letting a leftist ideology dictate how they will vote, as opposed to how they should vote?
Asking myself that question could never get an answer, since it requires your input, so I decided to go straight to you, the lawmaker and ask you one simple question. The answer does not require a long dissertation nor do I want one. The question is simple and so should the answer be. It requires, a YES or NO.
Before I ask it, its important to know, the following scenario is not likely to happen to you or your family members, however, it does indeed happen. And even if not to you, it does and will happen to those you propose to legislate for. This is a certainty even if you are given the authority to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate. Please be consious not only of your family as you read and answer this question, but also those who will, someday be faced with survival of this or a lessor magnitude.
Mr./Mrs. Legislator, before I ask my question I would like to tell you about myself because it is pertinent to it. I have raised a family, lived in this state my entire life, started and ran a construction company which employed many people. I have never been investigated, charged or arrested for anything nor have I in fact, ever broken any law. And I have not had even a driving ticket for over 35 years. I was drafted and served honorably in the US Army. I am a member of the NRA and a very prestigious Rifle Club. I have had training in safety and can use many types of weapons. While I'm not close to being a world class shooter, I do hit any target within 50 yards, every time.
As you answer this question, keep in mind, the laws you will or have voted on prevent me from ever having my weapon with me, anywhere except the shooting range or my home. Laws by the way, which have zero effect on criminals.
The Question: If you, or one or more of your family members, found themselves trapped in a building or location where one or more terrorists or deranged mass murderers were in the process of methodically killing everyone, would you like to know that I was in that location and had my 9mm Glock, locked and loaded with a 15 round magazine, un-holstered and with the safety off?
I would appreciate, no matter how you voted on these new gun laws, if you would return this email with your YES or No answer.
Finally, I am taking the time to send this to each of you individually. How many of you will have the courage to admit you would sacrifice the innocent lives of your loved ones in support of a leftist ideology? I'll bet, I won't hear from even one of you and I'll also bet, not one of you who would vote no to this question will inform your family of that.
May 11, 2013 TPATH- In light of this past week's Congressional hearings relating to the Benghazi coverup and the death of American citizens, allegations of political manipulation of information have become moot. It is clear now that the factual abetment of information slithering out from the Obama administration was not the result of fear over being ousted from the Presidency, but fear of being remanded to the penitentiary.
For sure, as with most high crimes, the exordium was instigated by politics. The fact that Obama had such a dismal record on every other front, domestic and foreign, it was imperative for him to be able to claim terrorism was defeated. But this denial, before the fact, not after, is where the culpability for the deaths of those Americans originated.
The hearings made it strikingly clear. This administration denied all requests for more security, prior to and leading up to the anniversary of 911, for one reason and one reason only. More manpower would equate to less security and would indicate that claims of the demise of terrorism were false. Regardless of the possible outcome, the lives of our heroes, it appears, were not even considered when weighted against the loss of a few votes.
Clearly, not providing more security could be a crime and the
stand down order for the FEST team located in Tripoli, just an hour
away, also is and possibly even a more blatant act of manslaughter.
Why? Because at that time, initiating a military response to Benghazi
would do two things. First and less important, it would prove that
Obama did not have the terrorists defeated. But more importantly
egregious, it would clearly indicate that not securing the Benghazi
Mission, when requested, was a dangerous and flagrant disregard for
If the legal description, provided below, does not perfectly construe this Benghazi crime scene its hard to imagine what would.
MANSLAUGHTER, INVOLUNTARY In order
for a person to be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter the
government must prove that someone was killed as a result of an act by
Second, in the circumstances existing at the time,
the person's act either was by its nature dangerous to human life or was
done with reckless disregard for human life; and
person either knew that such conduct was a threat to the lives of others
or knew of circumstances that would reasonably cause the person to
foresee that such conduct might be a threat to the lives of others.
The first denial of extra security for not only Benghazi,
but also Tripoli, is where the contrivance changed
from political to criminal.
Now enter the crime of obstruction. Once the administration understood that their actions were criminal in the flagrant disregard for human lives, and that disregard in fact did cause 4 deaths, the next crime of obstruction of justice began.
Blaming a ridiculous video, changing official information, hiding survivors, intimidating and demoting diplomats, refusing to disclose emails and communications between Libya and Washington, prior to, during and after the night long battle for survival, so very clearly falls into the realm of criminality. The obstruction of justice law, described below couldn't be more relevant. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Obstruction of justice is an attempt to interfere with the administration of the courts, the judicial system or law enforcement officers.
It may include tampering with or intimidating, hiding evidence or interfering with an arrest. It is something a person does to impede the administration of a court process or proper discharge of a legal duty.
Interference may be with the work of police, investigators, regulatory agencies, prosecutors, or other (usually government) officials. Often, no actual investigation or substantiated suspicion of a specific incident need exist to support a charge of obstruction of justice.
Such activity is a crime.
Knowing what we now know it is time to ensure the American people that Congress will get the answers to the following questions:
Who authored the stand down order to Lt. Col. Gibson which prevented Fest from engaging the terrorists who were attacking the Benghazi mission?
Where was Obama during the more than 12 hours of the siege and evacuation?
Who ordered Rice and Clinton to lie to the American people?
For certain there are a few more questions we would like to have answers to. Not the least of which is, will Hillary Clinton forsake her overwhelming desire to be the first female President (and the 2nd Communist) and fall on her sword for the Divider N Chief?
Knowing the Clintons as we do, its not likely that Slick Willie will allow that to happen. Especially since its also not likely that Billy has changed his percipience of Obama's abilities regarding the conveyance of the morning coffee break. (sorry about that, I couldn't help myself)
So.... stay tuned. Breaking the law is bad enough. Breaking the law and causing the death of Americans? Very, very serious.
Congress, the ball is in your court. You had better not let us down, again.